ISPC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ISPC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-18 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +21 | −38 | ~19 | 38 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~4 | 9 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +11 | −6 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-18
On July 31, 2025, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in a private placement (the “Private Placement”), an aggregate of 38,996 securities, comprised of (i) 6,684 shares of Common Stock at …
On May 8, 2026, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with certain Investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell 488,281 Shares, at a purchase price of $5.12 per Share. In lieu of Shares that would otherwise result in a purchaser’s beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% o…
On April 9, 2026, the Company’s board of directors approved a one-for-forty (1:40) reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The Reverse Stock Split became effective on April 27, 2026, and the Company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on…
On July 23, 2025, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement with WestPark (the “Underwriter”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in an underwritten public offering, an aggregate of 142,857 securities, consisting of (i) 37,066 shares of Common Stock, and (ii) pre-funded…
Revenue decreased by approximately $902,000, or 85%, from approximately $1,058,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to approximately $156,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2026. This was primarily due to the decrease of 1,419, or approximately 61%, in specimen count from 2,309 specim…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
On December 1, 2021, we closed on a private placement offering (“PIPE”) for gross proceeds of approximately $21 million, before deducting approximately $1.4 million for underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, for (i) an aggregate of 87,500 shares of common stock and (…
On July 31, 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell, in a Private Placement, an aggregate of 1,559,828 securities, comprised of (i) 267,379 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $1.122 per Share, a…
We incurred offering costs of approximately $100,000, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $1,649,998.
On March 5, 2024, we entered into the ATM Agreement with Rodman & Renshaw LLC as agent (the “Sales Agent”) pursuant to which we may issue and sell shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to $1,500,000, from time to time through the Sales Agent. The ATM Shares when issued…
On September 19, 2024, we entered into the Note Purchase Agreement with the Lender. Pursuant to the provisions of the Note Purchase Agreement, the Lender agreed to provide a loan to us in the amount of $1,000,000 and we agreed to issue to the Lender a promissory note in the principal amount of $1,00…
Controls & procedures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
● We have begun filing VDAs and/or registrations for sales and use taxes in certain states, and the filing and remittance of past due and current periodic sales and use taxes.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-18
Focus Technology Solutions, Inc. v. iSpecimen,; Suffolk (MA) Superior Court
On December 9, 2024, Focus Technologies, Inc. (“Focus”) filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of Suffolk County, Massachusetts, alleging non-payment under agreements dated July 29, 2022, related to the provision of information technology services. Focus is seeking approximately…
To restore service, the parties entered into a settlement agreement on February 11, 2025 (the “Settlement Agreement”), under which the Company agreed to pay $500,000 in nine monthly installments in exchange for the restoration of its platform. The Company made an initial payment of $50,000 on Februa…
Focus amended its complaint to enforce the Settlement Agreement and obtained an order for pre-judgment security in the amount of $420,000, to be funded by 15% of “revenue.” This order was clarified on December 17, 2025 to require only 15% of “net revenue,” with the result only $13,000 has been depos…
While the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that this litigation will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, or results of operations at this time.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
On or around January 15, 2025, Azenta initiated a claim against the Company for $651,262 arising from a breach of contract, and unjust enrichment basis amongst other things. The Company believes that Azenta’s claims are without legal or factual basis, and intends to vigorously defend these claims. T…
On or around November 14, 2024, EGS initiated a claim against the Company for $425,684 arising from a breach of contract, and compensation on a quantum meirut basis amongst other things. The Company believes that EGS’ claims are without legal or factual basis, and intends to vigorously defend these …
On December 9, 2024, Focus filed a complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of Suffolk County, Massachusetts, alleging non-payment under agreements dated July 29, 2022, related to the provision of information technology services. Focus is seeking approximately $489,572 in damages, plus in…
To restore service, the parties entered into the Settlement Agreement on February 11, 2025, under which the Company agreed to pay $500,000 in nine monthly installments in exchange for the restoration of its platform. The Company made an initial payment of $50,000 on February 12, 2025. However, Focus…
Focus has sought to amend its complaint to enforce the Settlement Agreement and has requested pre-judgment security in the amount of $450,000. The Company is opposing these efforts and intends to assert counterclaims against Focus for consequential damages arising from the service disruption and fai…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice