ITOX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ITOX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-09 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-12-12
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +15 | −17 | ~3 | 37 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-09
We regularly review the carrying value and estimated lives of its long-lived assets to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist that warrant adjustments to the carrying value or estimated useful lives. The determinants used for this evaluation include management’s estimate of the asset’s…
When we issue convertible debt or convertible preferred stock, we first evaluate the balance sheet classification of the convertible instrument in its entirety to determine whether the instrument should be classified as a liability under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and second wh…
On October 30, 2025, we had a change of control in management, and the Company and its debtholders mutually agreed to convert their convertible promissory notes due, and compensation due to officers in exchange for issuance of Series E Preferred Stock in full settlement of all balances due.
For the three months ended March 31, 2025, we did not record any revenues and related cost of sales. Our operating expenses totaled $92,258 which included payroll costs of $50,000, amortization of intangible assets of $12,205, and general and administrative expenses of $30,053. We recorded net other…
No revenues were earned in Q1, 2026, as in prior year quarter ending March 31, 2025. We believe revenue growth for the rest of 2026 will be challenging given the difficulty in raising additional capital to fuel sales and marketing efforts. Potential future revenue growth depends on our ability to ra…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-12
For the three months ended September 30, 2024, we did not earn any revenues and did not incur related cost of sales. Our operating expenses were $155,831 which included payroll costs of $50,000, amortization of intangible assets of $12,477, legal and professional fees of $84,279, and general and adm…
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024 (Unaudited)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, we did not earn any revenue and did not incur related cost of sales. Our operating expenses were $313,264 which included payroll costs of $150,000, amortization of intangible assets of $37,022, legal and professional fees of $108,381, and general and adm…
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, we earned revenues of $2,500 and recorded related cost of sales of $2,125. Our operating expenses were $327,186 which included payroll costs of $150,518, amortization of intangible assets of $37,159, legal and professional fees of $129,325, and general a…
During the current and prior period, we did not record an income tax benefit due to the uncertainty associated with the Company’s ability to utilize the deferred tax assets.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice