IVFH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of IVFH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-20 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +16 | −43 | ~10 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +15 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
The Company accounts for options in accordance with FASB ASC 718-40. Options are valued upon issuance utilizing the Black-Scholes valuation model. Option expense is recognized over the requisite service period of the related option award. The following table illustrates certain key information regar…
The Company maintained an allowance in the amount of $247,272 and $218,319 for credit losses at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The Company has an operational relationship of several years with our major customers, and we believe this experience provides us with a solid foundatio…
●National Distribution: Revenue was $2.5 million, 21% of total revenue, compared to $2.8 million in the prior year period. The decrease was primarily driven by stiffer competition and airline menu cycle changes.
Cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased by approximately 18% to $9.1 million compared to $11.1 million in the prior year period, which is primarily due to a 19% decrease in revenue. Gross margin remained flat at approximately 26%.
Total operating expenses decreased by $888 thousand, or 24%, primarily due to the factors described below:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
The Company provides an allowance for credit losses equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts pursuant to the guidance of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) as codified in ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. The Company utili…
Inventory consists of food products and is valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the average-cost method. The Company adjusts the inventory based upon bi-weekly cycle counts and upon the expiration date of food products. In addition, the Company records a prov…
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their esti…
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The estimated fair values approximate their carrying value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments or the stated interest rates are i…
● National Distribution: Revenue was $3.5 million, or 21.3% of total revenue, compared to $3.5 million in the prior year period. We expect this channel to continue to expand as we further develop over time broker relationships and deepen participation in airline menu programs. While overall airline …
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-20
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of…
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
During management’s evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, management identified material weaknesses related to information technology general controls over certain applications that support the Company’s financial reporting processes.
Management identified material weaknesses related to information technology general controls over certain applications that support the Company’s financial reporting processes. Specifically, management identified deficiencies associated with (a) effective user access controls to appropriately segreg…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
Our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-(f) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report, have determined that our disc…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(d) and 15d-15 that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, o…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice