KOP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of KOP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −10 | ~20 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Net sales increased $15.3 million or 3.0 percent in the second quarter of 2026 as compared to the prior year quarter. Excluding the net unfavorable impact of 2025 acquisitions, divestitures, and product line rationalizations of $16.3 million and the favorable currency conversion effect of $6.7 milli…
RUPS net sales decreased due primarily to approximately $11.9 million related to the sale of our railroad services business during the third quarter of 2025, price decreases across multiple markets, particularly for crossties, and unfavorable sales mix. These decreases were partly offset by a 16 per…
PC net sales increased due to an 11 percent volume increase, primarily in the Americas, partly offset by lower prices, primarily in Europe. Foreign currency changes from our international markets had a favorable impact on sales in the current year period of $2.2 million compared to the prior year pe…
CMC net sales increased due mainly to volume and price increases for carbon black feedstock and volume increases for carbon pitch. These increases were partly offset by lower volumes of phthalic anhydride and refined tar as well as lower sales prices for carbon pitch where prices were down approxima…
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 79 percent, compared to 77 percent in the prior year period as higher raw material and freight costs were partly offset by higher sales volumes. Significant items impacting cost of sales in individual operating segments are discussed as part of "Segment…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
RUPS net sales decreased due to customer mix in our Class I crosstie business, lower activity in our maintenance-of-way businesses, including approximately $9.6 million related to the sale of our railroad services business during the third quarter of 2025, and price decreases across multiple markets…
PC net sales increased due to a 15 percent volume increase along with higher sales prices, in each case, primarily in the Americas. Foreign currency changes from our international markets had a favorable impact on sales in the current year period of $2.7 million compared to the prior year period.
CMC net sales decreased mainly due to lower phthalic anhydride volumes of $13.9 million as we ceased production of the product in the second quarter of 2025 and lower sales prices across most products, especially carbon pitch where prices were down approximately nine percent globally driven by marke…
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 81 percent, compared to 77 percent in the prior year period as higher raw material and operating expenses combined with lower sales prices. Significant items impacting cost of sales in individual operating segments are discussed as part of "Segment Resu…
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $1.4 million higher when compared to the prior year period primarily as a result of depreciation on recent capital expenditures as well as higher asset retirement obligations in our European CMC operations.
Controls & procedures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
In the first quarter of 2026, we completed another phase of our new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system implementation and migrated part of our RUPS business onto the new system. As a result, we have implemented updates and changes to our current processes and related control activities. As th…
Except as noted above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our inter…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice