LOGI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of LOGI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-01-28
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +52 | −45 | ~43 | 48 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
•The impact of the incident in the manufacturing facilities of one of our semiconductor suppliers;
As we conduct operations globally, our business has continued to be impacted by ongoing macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions. These conditions include changes in inflation, interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations, uncertainty in consumer and enterprise demand, tariff and trade policies,…
In 2025, the United States introduced trade policy actions that increased import tariffs across a wide range of countries at various rates, with certain exemptions. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision invalidating certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emer…
Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the U.S. government introduced temporary tariffs for a 150-day period beginning February 24, 2026, which were subsequently invalidated by the U.S. Court of International Trade, but remained in effect pending appeal. In July 2026, the U.S. government announced…
We have also been affected by the increases in demand for electronic components, including semiconductor chips, caused by the build out of new AI technologies and data centers, leading to shortages and rising prices for such components utilized in some of our products. In addition, in late June 2026…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-28
In 2025, the United States introduced trade policy actions that have increased import tariffs across a wide range of countries at various rates, with certain exemptions. These tariff policies in the U.S. and responsive policies enacted in other countries are evolving. The incremental tariffs have ha…
The global and regional macroeconomic and political conditions, as well as changes in trade policies and memory supply, have caused and may continue to cause volatility in demand for our products, component availability, transit times and cost of our products including cost of tariffs, materials, an…
•AI: AI has reshaped expectations for productivity improvements, product innovation and technology ecosystem evolution. While we have used AI solutions and machine learning to enhance the features of different products in our portfolio, AI offers additional growth opportunities and risks as we work …
•New ways of working: The new ways of working that have emerged after the pandemic in which people are splitting time between working in the office, from home, and from other places while on the go, provide opportunities for Logitech to equip multiple workspaces with products across our portfolio in…
Our sales were $1,421.5 million and $3,755.2 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2025, respectively, an increase of 6% compared to $1,340.3 million and $3,544.5 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2024, respectively, primarily due to an increase in sales for…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
On June 12, 2026, Samantha Harnett, our Chief Legal Officer, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement providing for the sale of an aggregate of up to 16,265 shares of our registered shares acquired by Ms. Harnett under our equity plans. The trading arrangement is intended to satisfy the affirmative…
No other officers or directors, as defined in Rule 16a-1(f), adopted, modified and/or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K, during the last fiscal quarter.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice