Tickwind
HoyOportunidadesMercadosChat con IA
ES
Iniciar sesiónRegistrarse
Tickwind

Lee cada tick. Ve hacia dónde sopla el mercado.

  • XInglés
  • TelegramChino
  • BoletínInglés

Producto

  • Mercados
  • Zonas temáticas
  • Todas las acciones
  • Comparar
  • Acciones en tendencia
  • Oportunidades
  • Noticias
  • Discusión
  • Lista de seguimiento
  • Novedades

Cuenta

  • Ajustes
  • Boletín
  • Para prensa e investigación
  • Servidor MCP
  • Contacto
  • Iniciar sesión
  • Registrarse
MercadosZonas temáticasTodas las accionesCompararAcciones en tendenciaOportunidadesNoticiasDiscusiónLista de seguimientoNovedadesAjustesBoletínPara prensa e investigaciónServidor MCPContactoIniciar sesiónRegistrarse

© 2026 Tickwind. No es asesoría de inversión.

Hecho para el inversor curioso.

Home/LUV/Filing changes

LUV — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of LUV's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-22 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-23

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+42−41~4056
Market risk (Item 3)Text added/removed+4−501
Controls & proceduresText added/removed+3−200
Legal proceedingsText added/removed+7−8~41
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-22

  • Fuel costs per gallon, including fuel tax (unhedged)$3.87 $2.33 66.1 %
  • Operating revenues per ASM, excluding special items (cents)18.13 15.39 17.8 %
  • Fuel costs per gallon, including fuel tax (unhedged)$3.50 $2.33 50.2 %
  • The Company has also continued to enhance its onboard offerings, with improvements such as in-seat power, larger overhead bins, a refreshed cabin design, with new, more comfortable RECARO seats, and upgraded WiFi, with Starlink-equipped aircraft now in service as part of the Company's ongoing fleet-…
  • In third quarter 2026, the Company also paid $176 million to Shareholders through dividends. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below for further information.

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23

  • Operating expenses per ASM, excluding fuel, profitsharing, and special items (cents)12.45 12.04 3.4 %
  • Fuel costs per gallon, including fuel tax (unhedged)$3.87 $2.26 71.2 %
  • Operating expenses per ASM, excluding fuel, profitsharing, and special items (cents)12.76 12.40 2.9 %
  • Fuel costs per gallon, including fuel tax (unhedged)$3.31 $2.33 42.1 %
  • The Company has also continued to enhance its onboard offerings, with improvements such as in-seat power, larger overhead bins, and upgraded WiFi, with the first Starlink-equipped aircraft entering service on June 22, 2026, marking the beginning of a new era of inflight connectivity at Southwest. Wo…

Market risk (Item 3)

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-22

  • Changes in fuel prices could materially affect the Company’s results of operations. As discussed in Note 3 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company discontinued its fuel hedging program in 2025. During second quarter 2025, the Company terminated its remaining portfol…
  • As of September 30, 2026, the Company had no cash collateral provided to or held from derivative counterparties and thus had no cash collateral exposure. See Note 3 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
  • The Company currently has agreements with organizations that process credit card transactions arising from purchases of air travel tickets by its Customers utilizing American Express, Discover, and MasterCard/VISA. Credit card processors have financial risk associated with tickets purchased for air …
  • A majority of the Company’s sales transactions are processed by Chase Paymentech. Should Customer chargebacks processed by Chase Paymentech reach a certain level, cash proceeds from advance ticket sales could be held back and used to establish a reserve account to cover such chargebacks and any othe…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23

  • Changes in fuel prices could materially affect the Company’s results of operations. As discussed in Note 3 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company discontinued its fuel hedging program in
  • 2025. During second quarter 2025, the Company terminated its remaining portfolio of fuel hedging contracts, which were scheduled to settle through 2027, to effectively close its fuel hedging portfolio and program. Consequently, the Company is fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices, as is commo…
  • As of June 30, 2026, the Company had no cash collateral provided to or held from derivative counterparties and thus had no cash collateral exposure. See Note 3 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
  • The Company currently has agreements with organizations that process credit card transactions arising from purchases of air travel tickets by its Customers utilizing American Express, Discover, and MasterCard/VISA. Credit card processors have financial risk associated with tickets purchased for air …
  • A majority of the Company’s sales transactions are processed by Chase Paymentech. Should Customer chargebacks processed by Chase Paymentech reach a certain level, cash proceeds from advance ticket sales could be held back and used to establish a reserve account to cover such chargebacks and any othe…

Controls & procedures

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-22

  • The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, sum…
  • Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures a…
  • There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a–15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23

  • The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, sum…
  • There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a–15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over fina…

Legal proceedings

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-22

  • On December 27, 2019, a former customer service agent at Oakland International Airport, filed a putative class action complaint in the Superior Court of California, for the County of Santa Clara, against the Company alleging the following seven claims under the California Labor Code and Business & P…
  • On August 26, 2021, a complaint alleging breach of contract and seeking certification as a class action was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in Waco. The complaint alleges that the Company breached its Contract of Carriage and other alle…
  • was fully briefed by the parties. On April 16, 2026, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an unpublished opinion affirming the ruling of the District Court and holding that the plaintiffs lack Article III standing and the case therefore cannot proceed. The deadlines for the plaintiffs to seek a…
  • Starting on or about January 24, 2023, the Company’s senior officers and the Board received multiple derivative demand letters from legal counsel for purported Southwest Shareholders demanding that the Board investigate claims, initiate legal action, and take remedial measures in connection with the…
  • presented in certain of the prior Derivative Actions and Demands, which are being addressed consistent with applicable Texas law governing such demands. On April 1, 2025, the Company filed a motion to dismiss or stay the consolidated state court derivative actions based on the forum selection clause…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23

  • On January 7, 2019, a complaint alleging a violation of the federal Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”) and seeking a certification as a class action was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The compla…
  • On December 27, 2019, a former customer service agent at Oakland International Airport, filed a putative class action complaint in the Superior Court of California, for the County of Santa Clara, against the Company alleging the following seven claims under the California Labor Code and Business & P…
  • action and added a named plaintiff. The First Amended Complaint primarily seeks unpaid wages, interest thereon, and associated civil and statutory penalties, along with attorneys’ fees and costs. On February 26, 2025, the Court granted class certification as to the first cause of action for failure …
  • of wrongdoing in the complaint, believes the plaintiffs' positions below and on appeal are without merit, and intends to vigorously defend itself in all respects, including in opposing the appeal.
  • resolution of the Special Litigation Committee. Based upon the Special Litigation Committee report and the conclusions reached therein, the Special Litigation Committee, consistent with its appointment and delegated authority, unanimously adopted a resolution (i) determining that it is not in the be…

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on LUV

LUV overviewLUV quant ratingLUV fair value (DCF)LUV vs peersLUV revenue historyLUV AI deep research