MRVI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MRVI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +70 | −56 | ~17 | 45 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +5 | −5 | 0 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
We generated revenue of $51.4 million and $117.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and $47.4 million and $94.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.
TriLink: $34.7 million and $82.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and $31.1 million and $59.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.
Cygnus: $16.8 million and $35.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and $16.3 million and $34.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $32.1 million and $61.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, and $38.7 million and $78.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively.
On June 2, 2026, we entered into a new credit agreement, which provides for a $150.0 million term loan facility and a $30.0 million revolving credit facility, each maturing on June 2, 2032. In connection with the new credit agreement, we repaid all amounts outstanding under our prior credit agreemen…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
TriLink provides nucleic acid products and related services, including mRNA, oligonucleotides, CleanCap® mRNA capping and ModTail™ poly(A) tail modification technologies, synthesis inputs, specialty enzymes, and mRNA manufacturing services.
Cygnus provides biologics safety testing products and services, including host cell protein ELISA kits, impurity detection assays, viral clearance prediction tools, and related reagents and services.
We generated revenue of $65.8 million and $46.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
TriLink: $47.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and $28.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Cygnus: $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, and $18.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
As of June 30, 2026, our primary exposure to interest rate risk was associated with our variable rate long-term debt. Borrowings under our 2026 Credit Agreement bear interest at either (i) the Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“Term SOFR”) plus 5.00% per annum or (ii) an alternate base rate plu…
Credit Agreement until delivery of the first compliance certificate and related financial statements, the applicable margin is 5.00% per annum for Term SOFR borrowings and 4.00% per annum for alternate base rate borrowings. Thereafter, the applicable margin is based on the Company's senior secured f…
We had $150.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Term Loan, and no outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility as of June 30, 2026. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, the effect of a hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in overall interest rates wo…
We had cash and cash equivalents of $70.1 million as of June 30, 2026. Given the short-term nature of our investments, we do not believe there is any material risk to the value of our investments with increases or decreases in interest rates.
Substantially all of our revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars. Although, international sales accounted for 40.0% and 43.7% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, primarily in Europe and Asia Pacific, substantially all of these sales are denominated in U.S. d…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
As of March 31, 2026, our primary exposure to interest rate risk was associated with our variable rate long-term debt. Borrowings under our Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to the Base Rate plus a margin of 2.00%, with respect to each Base Rate-based loan, or the Term SOFR (Secured Ove…
We had $242.9 million of outstanding borrowings under our Term Loan and no outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2026. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the effect of a hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in overall interest rates would hav…
We had cash and cash equivalents of $165.9 million as of March 31, 2026. Given the short-term nature of our investments, we do not believe there is any material risk to the value of our investments with increases or decreases in interest rates.
Substantially all of our revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars. Although approximately 46.6% of our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was derived from international sales, primarily in Europe and Asia Pacific, substantially all of these sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. Our exp…
we are required to enter into agreements denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, results of operations and cash flows may increasingly be subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and may be adversely affected in the future due to changes in foreign curr…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to Note 5 (Commitments and Contingencies) to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As noted therein, the Derivative Actions were dismissed without pre…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, none of the Company’s directors or officers (as defined in Section 16 of the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (each as defined in Item 408(a) and (c) of Regulation S-K).
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
On March 10, 2026, Kurt Oreshack, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense Rule 10b5-1(c) for the sale of up to 50,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock prior to the expiration of th…
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of the Company’s other directors or officers (as defined in Section 16 of the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (each as defined in Item 408(a) and (c) of Regulation S-…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice