MYRG — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of MYRG's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-29 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −8 | ~27 | 62 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
We continue to implement strategies that are designed to further expand our capabilities and effectively allocate capital. We have maintained a strong balance sheet, while also supporting our organic and acquisitive growth, as well as opportunistically repurchasing shares. On July 1, 2026, we acquir…
(dollars in thousands)AmountPercentAmountPercentAmountPercentAmountPercent
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
Revenues increased $348.2 million, or 20.1%, to $2.08 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2026 from $1.73 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $251.2 million in C&I revenue, and an increase of $97.0 million in T&D revenue. See Segment…
Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2026 increased to 13.3% compared to 11.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase in gross margin was primarily due to significant changes in our estimated gross profit on certain projects resulting in a net gross margin increase of 0.7% fo…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-29
We continue to implement strategies that are designed to further expand our capabilities and effectively allocate capital. We have maintained a strong balance sheet, while also supporting our organic growth with capital expenditures, working capital and share repurchases. We believe the borrowing av…
Selling, general and administrative expenses69,423 6.9 62,524 7.5
Net cash flows provided by operating activities$84,749 $83,286
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities(20,521)(17,496)
As of March 31, 2026, we had working capital of $257.6 million. We define working capital as current assets less current liabilities. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, operating activities of our business provided net cash of $84.7 million, compared to $83.3 million of cash provided for …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice