NEOVWvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of NEOVW against SIC 3690 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Empresa | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEOVWEsta | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SES | $213M#1 | — | 1.1x#3 | 10.1x#4 | 929.4%#1 | 27.1%#1 | -393.4%#4 | -39.0%#4 | -67.0%#4 | — | -54.1%#1 | — |
| NEOV | $141M#2 | — | 6.4x#5 | 16.8x#5 | 218.6%#2 | -118.6%#3 | -56.0%#2 | -22.7%#3 | -37.9%#3 | — | — | — |
| ULBI | $92M#3 | — | 0.7x#2 | 0.5x#1 | 16.2%#3 | -193.4%#5 | -3.1%#1 | -4.5%#1 | -3.5%#1 | 4#1 | — | — |
| BEEM | $31M#4 | — | 1.5x#4 | 1.1x#3 | -42.8%#5 | -139.3%#4 | -97.5%#3 | -133.3%#5 | -126.6%#5 | 1#2 | — | — |
| SLDPW | $9M#5 | — | 0.0x#1 | 0.5x#2 | -11.1%#4 | 3.2%#2 | -562.9%#5 | -18.6%#2 | -21.1%#2 | — | -92.1%#2 | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3690). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. Esta tabla agotó el tiempo durante su construcción, por lo que cubre parte del grupo; los rangos son solo dentro de las filas mostradas y se completará en breve. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice