NIHK — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NIHK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2025-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-05-20
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −3 | ~11 | 97 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 9 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 12 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-08-14
Six Months ended June 30, 2025, as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2024
Revenues — The Company recorded $0.00 in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2025 as compared to $0.00 for the same period of June 30, 2024.
Operating Expenses — Total operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $13,710 as compared to $66,876 in the same period in, 2024, due to decreased operating activities, namely, the halt in our real estate operations, no consultants fees, during the period ended June 30, 2024.
As of June 30, 2025, the Company had a working capital of $74,817, consisting of cash of $1,500, twelve months of due from its Trade Receivable of monthly $6,510, and $4,803 in short-term liabilities.
For the six months period ended June 30, 2025, the Company generated $16,153 from operating activities, generated cash of $0 from investing activities, and used $37,868 on financing activities, resulting in an decrease in total cash of $21,715 and a cash balance of $1,500 for the period.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-05-20
As of March 31, 2025, the Company had a working capital of $76,415, consisting of cash of $1,500, twelve months of due from its Trade Receivable of monthly $6,510, and $3,205 in short-term liabilities.
For the three months period ended March 31, 2025, the Company generated $3,519 from operating activities, generated cash of $0 from investing activities, and used $24,234 on financing activities, resulting in an decrease in total cash of $21,715 and a cash balance of $1,500 for the period.
As of March 31, 2025, the Company had a cash balance of $1,500 (i.e., cash could be used to fund operations). The Company does believe our current cash balances will be sufficient to allow us to fund our operating plan for the next twelve months. However, our ability to continue as a going concern i…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice