OPY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OPY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-31 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-01
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +50 | −56 | ~22 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +3 | −3 | ~3 | 3 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
We are focused on growing our wealth management business through strategic additions of experienced financial advisors in our existing branch system and employment of experienced money management personnel in our asset management business as well as deploying our capital for expansion through target…
We continuously invest in and improve our technology platform to support client service and to remain competitive, while continuously managing expenses. We are also evaluating and selectively integrating artificial intelligence ("A.I.") solutions across our platform, with the goal of improving clien…
assessments of our compliance and risk management effort, and investing in people and programs, while providing a platform with first class investment programs and services.
The Company also reviews its full-service business model to determine the opportunities available to build or acquire closely related businesses in areas where others have shown some success. Equally important is the search for viable acquisition candidates. Our long-term intention is to pursue grow…
After lowering rates by a total of 75 basis points through three consecutive cuts in the fourth quarter of 2025, the Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate at 3.50% to 3.75% through its meetings in 2026 to date, including its most recent decision in June. In its most recent communications, Fede…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
Freedom Investments Inc. ("Freedom"), which formerly offered discount brokerage services on a limited basis, ceased operations in late 2025. Freedom's de-registration as an SEC-registered broker-dealer became effective on January 30, 2026. Freedom had been winding down its business for a number of y…
We are focused on growing our wealth management business through strategic additions of experienced financial advisors in our existing branch system and employment of experienced money management personnel in our asset management business as well as deploying our capital for expansion through target…
The Company also reviews its full service business model to determine the opportunities available to build or acquire closely related businesses in areas where others have shown some success. Equally important is the search for viable acquisition candidates. Our long-term intention is to pursue grow…
After lowering rates by a total of 75 basis points through three consecutive cuts in the fourth quarter of 2025, the Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate steady during its first quarter 2026 meetings, with officials indicating that any additional reductions would require clearer progress on i…
Further changes to the federal funds rate may continue to impact our interest-based revenues. Lower rates reduce fees earned from FDIC-insured client deposits through our sweep program, though this impact may be partially offset if the cash sweep balances rise as clients encounter fewer attractive a…
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
On April 24, 2026 the parties entered into a settlement of the litigation pursuant to which Oppenheimer agreed to pay $70 million in full and final settlement of all claims brought in the litigation. On May 13, 2026, Plaintiff filed in the district court a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Ac…
Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Approving Form and Manner of Notice, and Setting Date for Hearing on Final Approval of Settlement (“Order”) attached hereto. Pursuant to the terms of the Order on June 8, 2026 Oppenheimer deposited $70 million into an escrow account for the benefit of…
If the District Court grants final approval to the settlement, all claims asserted against the Company in the litigation would be resolved. The Company expects that the amount of the settlement will be fully tax deductible.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-01
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of the GBL. The Court held that plaintiff did not have standing to assert a class claim for breach of fiduciary duty, but granted plaintiff leave to amend the complaint by December 22, 2025 to include a plaintiff with standing. Plaintiff…
On April 24, 2026 the parties entered into a settlement of the litigation. The terms of the agreement are set forth in a binding term sheet executed by representatives for plaintiffs and Oppenheimer. Pursuant to the agreement, Oppenheimer has agreed to pay $70 million in full settlement of the claim…
The agreement is subject to the negotiation, execution, and delivery of a definitive settlement agreement and both preliminary and final approval by the District Court. There can be no assurance that a definitive settlement agreement will be executed or that the District Court will approve the propo…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice