OTTR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OTTR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +88 | −39 | ~19 | 22 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Operating Revenues increased $1.3 million primarily due to higher sales volumes in our Plastics and Manufacturing segments, higher steel costs passed through to customers in our Manufacturing segment and increased electric rates in our Electric segment. These increases were largely offset by lower s…
Operating Expenses increased $19.5 million primarily due to increased operating and maintenance expenses in the Electric segment and additional expenses driven by higher sales volumes in the Plastics and Manufacturing segments. These factors were partially offset by lower fuel and purchased power co…
Legal Settlement Expenses reflect a $103.5 million estimated loss contingency recognized in the Plastics segment related to the ongoing U.S. PVC pipe antitrust class action lawsuit and settlement agreements entered into during the period. See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for addi…
Other Income (Expense), net increased $2.5 million primarily due to an increase in allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) in our Electric segment, driven by our continued investments in our Abercrombie and Solway solar projects.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense was a benefit of $23.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to income tax expense of $13.7 million for the same period in 2025. The change was primarily attributable to a $26.3 million tax benefit recognized as a result of the litigation settlements…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Operating Revenues increased $9.7 million primarily due to increased revenues from our Electric segment driven by recent rate increases and higher sales volumes in our Manufacturing and Plastics segments, partially offset by lower sales prices in our Plastics segment. See our segment disclosures bel…
Operating Expenses increased $8.4 million primarily due to an increase in production fuel costs in our Electric segment, increased material costs and sales volumes in our Manufacturing segment, and increased sales volumes in our Plastics segment, partially offset by a decrease in material costs in o…
Nonservice Components of Postretirement Benefits decreased by $0.8 million, having a negative impact on net income, primarily due to a decrease in the amortization of plan amendment-related gains and an increase in the amortization of actuarial losses.
Income Tax Expense decreased $5.2 million primarily due to an increase in PTCs at OTP driven by increased wind generation which qualified for credits. Our effective tax rate was 6.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 12.9% for the same period last year.
The following table summarizes Electric segment operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice