PD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-27 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-28
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −9 | ~22 | 58 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +5 | −1 | ~1 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-27
Net income attributable to PagerDuty, Inc. common stockholders$4,726 3.8 %$9,777 7.9 %
Cost of revenue increased primarily due to: (i) an increase of $0.7 million in costs to support the business and related infrastructure, which include allocated overhead costs; (ii) an increase of $0.5 million in personnel costs, primarily related to increases in commissions and bonuses; and (iii) a…
Research and development expenses remained flat primarily due to: (i) an increase of $1.7 million in costs to support the business and related infrastructure, which include allocated overhead costs; and (ii) an increase of $0.5 million in outside services spend; offset by (iii) a decrease of $2.0 mi…
Six months ended July 31, 2026 compared to six months ended July 31, 2025
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the periods indicated and as a percentage of revenue (in thousands, except percentages):
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-28
The decrease in cost of revenue is primarily due to: (i) a decrease of $1.0 million in amortization of acquired intangible assets; (ii) a decrease of $0.6 million in outside services spend for the customer service team; (iii) a decrease of $0.4 million in merchant fees; and (iv) a decrease of $0.1 m…
Research and development expenses decreased primarily due to: (i) a decrease of $5.4 million in personnel costs primarily as a result of a decrease in stock-based compensation; offset by (ii) an increase of $1.1 million in costs to support the business and related infrastructure, which include alloc…
We define non-GAAP operating income as income (loss) from operations excluding stock-based compensation expense, employer taxes related to employee stock transactions, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related expenses, restructuring costs, and shareholder matters, which are no…
Net income (loss) attributable to PagerDuty, Inc. common stockholders$10,246 $(6,497)
Employer taxes related to employee stock transactions226 718
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-27
Our previous and any future restructuring efforts may not result in the anticipated savings or operational efficiencies expected, could result in greater total costs and expenses than we estimated, and could disrupt our business.
We have undertaken, and may undertake from time to time in the future, certain restructuring efforts to drive more efficient growth and advance our scaling initiatives. For example, in August 2026, we announced that as part of our ongoing actions to improve operational efficiency and better align re…
Furthermore, restructuring efforts may be disruptive to our operations. For example, headcount reductions could yield unanticipated consequences, such as attrition beyond planned staff reductions, increased difficulties in our day-to-day operations, and reduced employee morale. If employees who were…
Our success and future growth depend upon the continued services of our management team and other key employees. From time to time, there may be changes in our management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives and key employees, which could disrupt our business. Our senior managem…
Additionally, in November 2025, we announced the planned retirement of Howard Wilson, our Chief Financial Officer, and in June 2026, we announced the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer, Eric Prengel. Such significant changes among our senior executives may create uncertainty or present cha…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-28
Our success and future growth depend upon the continued services of our management team and other key employees. From time to time, there may be changes in our management team resulting from the hiring or departure of executives and key employees, which could disrupt our business. Our senior managem…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice