PECO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PECO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-24 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-24
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +52 | −28 | ~34 | 84 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-24
(1)Line items that result in a percent change that exceed certain limitations are considered not meaningful (“NM”) and indicated as such.
Our basis for analyzing significant fluctuations in our results of operations generally includes review of the results of our same-center portfolio, non-same-center portfolio, and revenues and expenses from our management activities. We define our same-center portfolio as the 280 properties that wer…
•$6.8 million increase primarily related to our same-center portfolio as follows:
▪$4.4 million increase primarily due to a $0.56 increase in average minimum rent PSF and a 0.3% improvement in average occupancy;
▪$1.2 million increase primarily due to the impact of straight-line rent adjustments;
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-24
% ABR from omni-channel grocery-anchored shopping centers94.3 %95.3 %
Our basis for analyzing significant fluctuations in our results of operations generally includes review of the results of our same-center portfolio, non-same-center portfolio, and revenues and expenses from our management activities. We define our same-center portfolio as the 282 properties that wer…
•$6.4 million increase primarily related to our same-center portfolio as follows:
▪$3.7 million increase primarily due to a $0.52 increase in average minimum rent PSF and a 0.3% improvement in average occupancy;
▪$1.5 million increase primarily due to lease buyout income; and
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-24
During the quarter ended June 30, 2026, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial re…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-24
evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective as of March 31, 2026, at a reasonable assurance level.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2026, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial r…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice