PHCI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PHCI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-22 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-03-23
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −5 | ~19 | 23 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 5 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +3 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-22
Effective April 30, 2026, T. Benjamin Jennings will no longer serve as Chief Executive Officer of Panamera Holdings Corporation.Mr. Jennings will continue to serve as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company. This change will be essential as Panamera moves forward implementing the strategi…
Effective April 30, 2026, Cristopher Proler will no longer serve as President and Board Member of Panamera Holdings.
Effective June 15, 2026, Blair Aiken is elected by the Board of Directors to serve as President and interim CEO of the Company.Mr. Aiken will also be named as a Board Member and Chairmen of the Board for the Company. The addition of Mr. Aiken will be a driving force as Panamera moves forward impleme…
For the time being The Board of Directors will cover these positions while searching for candidates who have the expertise to provide and execute a new vision for Panamera Holdings.
As of April 30, 2026, our current assets were $62,365 and our current liabilities were $4,342,438 which resulted in working capital deficiency of $4,280,073. As of April 30, 2026, current assets were comprised of $46 in cash, $5,276 in prepaid expenses and $57,043 in accounts receivable compared to …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-23
As of January 31, 2026, our current assets were $81,255 and our current liabilities were $4,255,467 which resulted in working capital deficiency of $4,174,212. As of January 31, 2026, current assets were comprised of $17,061 in cash, $7,151 in prepaid expenses and $57,043 in accounts receivable comp…
As of January 31, 2026, our working capital (deficiency) increased by $4,114,281 from a $59,931 working capital deficiency at July 31, 2025, to $4,174,212 of working capital deficiency at January 31, 2026, primarily due to a decrease in current assets of $14,169 and an increase in current liabilitie…
We have not generated positive cash flows from operating activities. For the six months ended January 31, 2026, net cash flows used in operating activities were $241,308, consisting of a net loss of $153,790,175, reduced by research and development expenses -license of $153,400,000, imputed interest…
For the six months ended January 31, 2025, net cash flows used in operating activities were $41,287, consisting of a net loss of $191,076, reduced by imputed interest on related parties’ loan of $3,762, stock - based compensation of $13,482, non-cash lease expenses of $19,539 and a net change in wor…
For the six months ended January 31, 2026, and 2025, no cashflows were provided by or used in investing activities.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-22
From time to time, we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business.
We are aware that Jeffrey Kilgore filed a lawsuit on August 28, 2025, in Jefferson County, Texas. Cause No. 25DCCV1693, Jefferson County, Texas; Jeff Kilgore vs. Panamera Holdings Corporation; the Plaintiff is claiming he is owed certain shares in compensation for services. This claim is disputed an…
To the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party, and which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-23
From time to time, we may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. We are aware that Jeffrey Kilgore filed a lawsuit on August 28, 2025, in Jefferson County, Texas. Cause No. 25DCCV1693, Jefferson County, Texas; Jeff Kilgore vs.…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice