PINE — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PINE's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-23 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-23
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −13 | ~10 | 21 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-23
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, the Company acquired four properties for a combined purchase price of $46.8 million, including capitalized acquisition costs. Of the total acquisitions, the Company acquired two properties for a combined purchase price of $20.5 million, including capitalize…
The following presents the Company’s results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025 (in thousands):
As further described in Note 7, “Provision for Impairment,” during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company recorded impairment charges of $0.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively, representing the provision for losses related to certain income properties, for which the Company’…
The Company did not sell any properties during the three months ended June 30, 2026. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company sold five properties for an aggregate sales price of $16.5 million, generating aggregate gains on sale of $0.9 million.
Investment and other income totaled $0.4 million and less than $0.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase is primarily due to the receipt of a $0.3 million nonrefundable deposit forfeited by a potential buyer on a property that was previously under …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-23
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company acquired one property for a purchase price of $10.0 million through a sale-leaseback transaction that includes a tenant repurchase option. Due to the existence of the tenant repurchase option, and pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 842, Leases, GAAP …
COMPARISON OF THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 AND 2025
The following presents the Company’s results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025 (in thousands):
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company recorded a $0.5 million impairment charge which represents the CECL reserve related to our commercial loans and investments. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded a $1.8 million impairment charge representing the …
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company sold three properties for an aggregate sales price of $5.8 million, generating aggregate gains on sale of $0.1 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company sold three properties for an aggregate sales price of $11.7 mill…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice