PNW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PNW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +72 | −37 | ~40 | 83 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +3 | −2 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
wind, provided by APS field sensors and the modeling software. APS has educated and will continue education outreach to customers and communities that may potentially be impacted by the PSPS program.
APS was selected by DOE’s Grid Deployment Office (“GDO”) to receive up to $70 million in federal money for fire mitigation and grid infrastructure projects. This funding is part of the GDO’s Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership Program and is contingent on APS negotiating and executing final g…
APS has seen increasing demand from large load customers in recent years. In the 2025 Rate Case, APS requested adjustments to rate designs and modification of cost allocation methodologies to ensure
growth pays for growth and reduce cross-subsidization by customer classes. In line with the 2025 Rate Case, APS has developed an approach it believes will allow for these large load customers to fund the incremental infrastructure needed to serve them through long-term contracts where they cover cap…
There are also external opportunities that allow APS to deliver more affordable energy to customers, such as APS’s participation in western energy markets and programs. APS participated in market design and tariff development of Markets+, a day-ahead and real-time market offering from the Southwest …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
APS was selected by DOE’s Grid Deployment Office (“GDO”) to receive up to $70 million in federal money for fire mitigation and grid infrastructure projects. This funding is part of the GDO’s Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership Program and is contingent on APS negotiating and executing final g…
bill that requires Arizona electric utilities to develop and seek approval for wildfire mitigation plans and defines the standard of care with respect to wildfire-related claims by reference to such plans. Pursuant to that legislation, APS has submitted its Comprehensive Wildfire Mitigation Plan to …
APS has seen increasing demand from large load customers in recent years. In the 2025 Rate Case, APS requested adjustments to rate designs and modification of cost allocation methodologies to ensure growth pays for growth and reduce cross-subsidization by customer classes. In line with the 2025 Rate…
There are also external opportunities that allow APS to deliver more affordable energy to customers, such as APS’s participation in western energy markets and programs. APS participated in market design and tariff development of Markets+, a day-ahead and real-time market offering from the Southwest …
In terms of recent solicitations, APS issued an ASRFP on June 30, 2023, pursuant to which APS procured 3,606 MW of battery storage, 517 MW of natural gas, 2,649 MW of solar, and 500 MW of wind resources expected to be in service from 2026 to 2028. APS issued another ASRFP on November 20, 2024, pursu…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
On October 1, 2015, EPA finalized revisions to the primary ground-level ozone NAAQS at a level of 70 parts per billion (“ppb”). As ozone standards become more stringent, our fossil generation units will come under increasing pressure to reduce emissions of NOx and volatile organic compounds, and to …
On November 19, 2025, EPA issued a proposed rule determining that the Phoenix-Mesa area would have met the 2015 ozone NAAQS standard by its August 3, 2024 “Moderate” attainment date, “but for” emissions emanating from outside of the United States. This proposal was subsequently finalized on March 23…
During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2026, none of our directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
On April 30, 2026, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“IBEW”) voted in favor of a two-year contract extension, extending the current collective bargaining agreement with wage increases through April 1, 2028.
During the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as each term is defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice