PRAA — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRAA's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +49 | −42 | ~18 | 93 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
During the second quarter of 2026, we continued to execute against our PRA 3.0 strategic plan and generated continued cash collections growth while maintaining disciplined cost management and investing in future growth initiatives. We purchased $296.6 million in portfolios during the quarter and gen…
•Year-to-date Net income attributable to PRA Group, Inc. of $86.1 million, an increase of $40.1 million compared to the prior year period.
•Adjusted EBITDA of $1.4 billion for the last 12 months, an increase of 9.6% compared to the prior 12 month period ("Adjusted EBITDA" is a non-GAAP financial measure; refer to section "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below).
•Continued geographic diversification, with the U.S. and Europe accounting for 40.4% and 54.0%, respectively, of June 30, 2026 total estimated remaining collections ("ERC") of $8.9 billion. Driven by sustained cash collections overperformance, we updated the forecasts for the majority of our Europea…
•A second wave of cost reductions to simplify our U.S. business and drive further savings; and further consolidation of our U.S. call center footprint and offshore third-party collection agencies.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
During the first quarter of 2026, we continued to gain momentum in improving our U.S. business and benefited from the strength of our European business, executing on our near-term priorities and long-term PRA 3.0 strategy. Our results for the first quarter of 2026 included the following:
•Adjusted EBITDA of $1.3 billion for the last 12 months, an increase of 13.9% compared to the prior 12 month period ("Adjusted EBITDA" is a non-GAAP financial measure; refer to section "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below).
•Continued geographic diversification, with the U.S. and Europe accounting for 42.7% and 50.7%, respectively, of total ERC of $8.5 billion as of March 31, 2026.
•A diversified capital structure, consistent with our targeted leverage and liquidity objectives. In April 2026, we refinanced our European revolving credit facility for an additional five years with no change to the commitment levels or funding costs (refer to Note 15 for additional details).
We expect portfolio supply to remain relatively stable in the U.S. and Europe over the next 12 to 18 months. We observed stability in our customers' payment activity in the U.S. and Europe during the first quarter of 2026, and we continue to monitor the ongoing geopolitical conflict and instability …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice