PRK — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-03
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +141 | −111 | ~36 | 56 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | ~4 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
As noted above, in calculating the ACL, management weighs different scenarios, including a baseline (most likely) scenario and an adverse scenario. At March 31, 2026, management applied a 50% weighting to the baseline scenario and applied a 50% weighting to the adverse scenario. To create hypothetic…
2026 if only the adverse scenario was used. Excluding consideration of qualitative adjustments, a corresponding $32.5 million decrease in Park's ACL would occur in a hypothetical scenario if only the baseline (most likely) scenario was used.
Business Combinations: Business combinations are accounted for by applying the acquisition method. As of acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are measured at fair value and recognized separately from goodwill. The calculation of the core deposit intangible asset…
The valuation of core deposit intangibles acquired in business combinations is a critical accounting estimate due to the significant judgment required in estimating deposit attrition, discount rates, the cost of alternative funding sources, and net maintenance costs. These assumptions directly affec…
The valuation of loans acquired in a business combination is a critical accounting estimate due to the significant judgment required in estimating expected cash flows, credit losses, and discount rates. Following adoption of ASU 2025‑08, acquired loans are accounted for using a gross‑up approach, wi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-03
As noted above, in calculating the ACL, management weighs different scenarios, including a baseline (most likely) scenario and an adverse scenario. At September 30, 2025, management applied a 50% weighting to the baseline scenario and applied a 50% weighting to the adverse scenario. To create hypoth…
On October 27, 2025, Park entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., a Tennessee corporation (“First Citizens”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, First Citizens will me…
As of September 30, 2025, First Citizens had $2.6 billion in assets. After the Merger, Park will have more than 100 branches in Kentucky, Ohio, the Carolinas and Tennessee.
Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies, each share of common stock of First Citizens that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger, will be converted into the right to re…
The Merger is expected to close in the first quarter of 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, regulatory approvals and approval of First Citizens’ shareholders.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
On page 67 of Park’s 2025 Form 10-K, management reported that at December 31, 2025, the earnings simulation model projected that net income would increase by 1.7% using a rising interest rate scenario and decrease by 2.1% using a declining interest rate scenario over the next year. At March 31, 2026…
Report on Form 10-Q). Based on that evaluation, Park’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Park’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer have concluded that:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-03
On page 67 of Park’s 2024 Form 10-K, management reported that at December 31, 2024, the earnings simulation model projected that net income would increase by 1.3% using a rising interest rate scenario and decrease by 1.3% using a declining interest rate scenario over the next year. At September 30, …
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
Report on Form 10-Q). Based on that evaluation, Park’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Park’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer have concluded that:
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice