PSN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PSN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-28 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +14 | −14 | ~38 | 59 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-28
The increase in awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 in our Federal Solutions segment when compared to the corresponding period last year was primarily driven by significant awards. The comparable period included a delay in the timing of awards of a number of contracts being…
The increase in Federal Solutions backlog was primarily related to an overall increase in awards partially offset by a reduction in work on our confidential contract as a result of the Department of State reorganization issued May 29, 2025. The increase in backlog in the Critical Infrastructure segm…
Under cost-plus contracts, we are reimbursed for allowable or otherwise defined costs incurred, plus a fee. The contracts may also include incentives for various performance criteria, including quality, timeliness, safety and cost-effectiveness. In addition, costs are generally subject to review by …
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
PARSONS CORPORATION Enabling a safer, smarter, and more interconnected world. Engineered solutions for complex physical and digital infrastructure challenges SEGMENTS KEY FACTS AND FIGURES Technology-driven solutions for defense and intelligence customers FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT $4B Total Revenue Trailin…
The increase in awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 in our Critical Infrastructure segment when compared to the corresponding period last year was primarily driven by an overall increase in awards in the current year period. The increase in awards for the three and six months end…
The increase in backlog in the Critical Infrastructure segment was primarily from ordinary course fluctuations in our business and an overall increase in awards. The decrease in Federal Solutions backlog was primarily related to a reduction in work on our confidential contract as a result of the Dep…
Under cost-plus contracts, we are reimbursed for allowable or otherwise defined costs incurred, plus a fee. The contracts may also include incentives for various performance criteria, including quality, timeliness,
safety and cost-effectiveness. In addition, costs are generally subject to review by clients and regulatory audit agencies, and such reviews could result in costs being disputed as non-reimbursable under the terms of the contract.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice