QCLS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of QCLS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-19
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +51 | −127 | ~29 | 25 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | −26 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
On April 13, 2026, the Company entered into an executive compensation agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Joshua Silverman, who serves as the Company’s Executive Chairman, setting forth the terms and conditions of Mr. Silverman’s continued employment as a member of the Company’s Board of Dir…
The Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Silverman will be entitled to receive an annual base salary of one hundred and twenty thousand dollars ($120,000) (“Base Salary”), payable in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices. For each fiscal year during the employment period, Mr. Silv…
Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Mr. Silverman is entitled to receive, on the Effective Date and subsequently on the first day of each calendar quarter thereafter, a number of fully vested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) equal to an aggregate value of $60,000 per grant calculated based on the c…
In the event Mr. Silverman’s employment is terminated by the Company for Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or by Mr. Silverman without Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement), Mr. Silverman will be entitled to: (i) any earned but unpaid Base Salary earned during his employm…
If Mr. Silverman’s employment is terminated prior to the end of the term by the Company without Cause or by Mr. Silverman for Good Reason, then, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement (including the execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims), Mr. Silver…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-19
Since September 2025, the Company has undertaken several initiatives to implement its strategic shift, including closing a $7.0 million private placement of Series H Preferred Stock, changing its corporate name and ticker symbol to QCLS to align branding with laser-based computing, appointing a seni…
Over the next twelve months, the Company anticipates finalizing qc-LPU100 prototypes, conducting internal performance benchmarking for DePin Token and artificial intelligence high-performance computing applications, securing patents or extensions on intellectual property licensed under the agreement…
The Company plans to generate revenue primarily through direct sales, leasing, and licensing of qc-LPU100 units to AI and DePin Token users and cryptocurrency infrastructure participants. Potential revenue streams may include hardware sales, subscription-based access to LPU clusters, and royalties f…
The Company’s focus on energy-efficient laser-based computing for cryptocurrency infrastructure intersects the broader blockchain and photonic integrated circuits (“PICs”) and silicon photonics markets. Growth in these markets is driven by the industry’s transition toward hybrid blockchain models an…
The Company faces multi-layered hurdles at the intersection of crypto, hardware, and emerging quantum technology. The Company’s hardware may also be subject to export controls under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) and Export Administration Regulations (EAR), as well as FCC and U…
Risk factors
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-19
The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be important to understanding other statements in this Form 10-Q. The following information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes in Par…
We may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could harm our competitive position.
Our success and future revenue growth will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We will primarily rely on patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies or processes.…
Currently, the Company has 19 issued U.S. patents, 70 foreign patents, and 4 foreign patent applications pending in such jurisdictions as Canada, China, Isreal, and Japan, which if issued are expected to expire between 2036 and 2041. Although we expect to obtain additional patents and in-licenses in…
Holders of our shares of Series H Preferred Stock are entitled to certain payments under the applicable Series H Certificate of Designations that may be paid in cash, which may require the expenditure of a substantial portion of our cash resources.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice