RBRK — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RBRK's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-01 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-06-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −25 | ~30 | 44 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +33 | −33 | ~43 | 309 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-01
Subscription ARR does not include any maintenance revenue associated with perpetual licenses, which we generally no longer offer.
In the longer term, we view continued Subscription ARR growth, operating leverage, and the mix of annual versus upfront payment terms on our multi-year contracts as primary drivers of free cash flow. See the risk factor titled “We expect fluctuations in our financial
results, making it difficult to project future results, and if we fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors with respect to our results of operations, our stock price and the value of your investment could decline” in the section titled “Risk Factors.”
Free cash flow was $139.3 million and $90.9 million for the six months ended July 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The improvement in free cash flow was primarily due to higher sales, including timing of renewals, improved operating leverage and optimizing our capital structure. This trend when comb…
We define Subscription ARR Contribution Margin as the Subscription ARR Contribution (as defined below) divided by Subscription ARR at the end of the period. We define Subscription ARR Contribution as Subscription ARR at the end of the period less: (i) our non-GAAP subscription cost of revenue and (i…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-05
Subscription ARR does not include any maintenance revenue associated with perpetual licenses, which we generally no longer offer. Of the 32% and 38% growth, approximately 0.4 percentage points and 2 percentage points of growth for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, were a …
Free cash flow was $73.6 million and $33.3 million for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The improvement in free cash flow was primarily due to higher sales, including timing of renewals, improved operating leverage and optimizing our capital structure. This trend when co…
In the longer term, we view continued Subscription ARR growth, operating leverage, and the mix of annual versus upfront payment terms on our multi-year contracts as primary drivers of free cash flow. See the risk factor titled “We expect fluctuations in our financial results, making it difficult to …
We define Subscription ARR Contribution Margin as the Subscription ARR Contribution (as defined below) divided by Subscription ARR at the end of the period. We define Subscription ARR Contribution as Subscription ARR at the end of the period less: (i) our non-GAAP subscription cost of revenue and (i…
Subscription ARR Contribution Margin was 13% and 8% for the 12 months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase in Subscription ARR Contribution Margin was primarily driven by the strong year-over-year Subscription ARR growth outpacing the year-over-year growth in non-GAAP subscripti…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-01
attention. We could also face inefficiencies, vulnerabilities, or service disruptions as a result of our efforts to scale our internal infrastructure, which may result in extended outages, loss of customer trust, and harm to our reputation. We cannot be sure that the expansion of and improvements to…
•Vendors that provide agent security, including observability, governance, identity, and posture.
•margin impact due to increased cost of the Rubrik-branded Appliances that are not yet transitioned from us to our contract manufacturers;
ability to manage finances could be interrupted, and our processes for managing sales of our solutions and supporting our customers could be impaired until equivalent services, if available, are identified, obtained, and implemented, all of which could adversely affect our business and results of op…
expect, and we may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals in the markets where we do or plan to do business. In addition, a large percentage of our sales force is new to our company and selling our solutions, and therefore, this group may be less effective than our m…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-05
expansion of and improvements to our internal infrastructure will be effectively implemented on a timely basis, if at all, and such failures could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
productivity. We cannot predict whether, or to what extent, our sales will increase as we expand our sales force or how long it will take for sales personnel to become productive. If we are unable to hire and train a sufficient number of effective sales personnel, or the sales personnel we hire are …
The competitive position of our solutions depends in part on their ability to operate with products and services of third parties, including software companies, software services, and infrastructure, and our solutions must be continuously modified and enhanced to adapt to changes in commodity applia…
services, and infrastructure with our solutions, or our solutions may not support the capabilities needed to integrate with such software, software services, and infrastructure. In addition, to the extent that a third party was to develop software or services that compete with ours, that provider ma…
Our data security solutions are subject to U.S. export controls, including the Export Administration Regulations, and we incorporate encryption technology into our solutions. Our data security solutions and the underlying technology may be exported outside of the United States only in compliance wit…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice