RCON — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RCON's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2016-11-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2016-05-16
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −59 | ~24 | 39 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~7 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2016-11-14
As of the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, the Company has achieved remarkable achievement in oilfield waste water treatment segment. In January 2016, the Company announced its cooperation with Qinghai Oilfield Company, signing an agreement to sell the oilfield RMB3.98 million of related products …
The Company has also developed new clients in China’s top producing Changqing Oilfield, which is located in China’s Xi’an Province. The Company has signed sales contracts for furnaces as of the report day. Management expects further improvement in the coming year.
As a smaller China-focused company, our basic strategy focuses on developing our onshore oilfield business in the upstream sector of the industry.
On January 1, 2015, China formally began implementing an updated Environmental Protection Law (the China EPL). The EPL is perceived as the most progressive and stringent law in the history of environmental protection in China. It details harsher penalties for environmental offences and imposes addit…
Our operating results in any period are subject to general conditions typically affecting the Chinese oilfield service industry and included but are not limited to:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2016-05-16
Our Domestic Companies provide the oil and gas industry with equipment, production technologies, automation and services.
On September 22, 2015, the Company entered into an amendment to the Company’s letter agreement (the “Agreement”) with Maxim Group LLC, dated January 28, 2015, pursuant to which Maxim would serve as the Company’s exclusive agent in connection with a proposed at-the-market offering program by the Comp…
On December 1, 2015, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement to acquire a 100% interest in Qinghai Huayou Downhole Technologies Co., Ltd. ( “QHHY”), a PRC corporation and oilfield service provider located in Qinghai province. This transaction is subject to shareholder approval and on May…
As a smaller China-focused company, our basic strategy focuses on developing our onshore oilfield business in the upstream sector of the industry. Due to the remote location and difficult environments of China’s oil and gas fields, historically, foreign competitors have rarely entered those areas di…
Our operating results in any period are subject to general conditions typically affecting the Chinese oilfield service industry including:
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice