REGCP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of REGCP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +74 | −40 | ~50 | 107 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~7 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-03
Development and redevelopment projects completed during the six months ended June 30, 2026 represented $62.6 million of estimated net project costs, with an average stabilized yield of 9.6%. A stabilized yield for development and redevelopment projects represents the incremental NOI (estimated stabi…
Estimated Pro-rata project costs of our current in process development and redevelopment projects totaled $679.7 million at June 30, 2026, compared to $597.4 million at December 31, 2025.
$6.1 million net increase due to increases from occupancy, contractual rent steps in existing leases, and positive rental spreads on new and renewal leases;
$3.7 million increase due to redevelopment projects commencing operations; and
$2.5 million increase related to the acquisitions of remaining ownership interests, resulting in consolidation of properties previously held in unconsolidated real estate partnerships;
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
Estimated Pro-rata project costs of our current in process development and redevelopment projects totaled $634.8 million at March 31, 2026, compared to $597.4 million at December 31, 2025.
Development and redevelopment projects completed during the three months ended March 31, 2026 represented $42.0 million of estimated net project costs, with an average stabilized yield of 7.9%. A stabilized yield for development and redevelopment projects represents the incremental NOI (estimated st…
$11.6 million increase resulting from same properties, including:
$5.0 million increase due to increases from occupancy, contractual rent steps in existing leases, and positive rental spreads on new and renewal leases;
$4.1 million increase due to redevelopment projects that commenced operations; and
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice