RIGL — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RIGL's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +51 | −28 | ~18 | 106 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +59 | −53 | ~38 | 319 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
VEPPANU (vepdegestrant) is our fourth FDA-approved product which we expect to become commercially available in mid-August 2026. VEPPANU is an oral PROTAC approved by the FDA for the treatment of ER+/HER2-, ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as detected by an FDA-authorized test, with…
Our development pipeline includes R289, our dual IRAK1/4 inhibitor, which is being advanced in an open-label, Phase 1b study to determine the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the drug in patients with lower-risk MDS who are relapsed, refractory or resistant to prior therapies.
VEPPANU is our fourth FDA-approved product which we expect to become commercially available in mid-August 2026. We in-licensed VEPPANU pursuant to a license agreement entered in May 2026 with Arvinas and Pfizer (together, the Licensors), which agreement became effective on June 11, 2026 upon the ear…
ESR1-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer, as detected by an FDA-authorized test, with disease progression following at least one line of endocrine therapy.
Under the license agreement, we agreed to pay the Licensors a license fee of up to $85.0 million, including $70.0 million upfront payment which we paid in June 2026, and up to an additional $15.0 million payable upon the successful completion of certain transition activities. In addition, the Licens…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Our development pipeline includes R289, our dual IRAK1/4 inhibitor program, which is being advanced in an open-label, Phase 1b study to determine the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the drug in patients with lower-risk MDS who are relapsed, refractory or resistant to prior therapies…
We advanced the development of our dual IRAK1/4 inhibitor program, following evaluation of single and multiple ascending doses of R289 in healthy subjects. The ongoing Phase 1b open-label, multicenter study evaluates the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of R289 in patients with R/R lowe…
complete enrollment of the dose expansion phase of the Phase 1b study and select the recommended Phase 2 dose for future clinical studies in the second half of 2026. We anticipate sharing preliminary data from the dose expansion phase of the study by the end of 2026.
We have a Strategic Collaboration Agreement with MDACC, a comprehensive cancer research, treatment, and prevention center. The collaboration expanded our evaluation of olutasidenib in AML and other hematologic cancers with IDH1 mutations. Under the Strategic Collaboration Agreement, we jointly lead …
On April 16, 2026, we received written notice from Lilly of its decision to terminate the Lilly Agreement, which will become effective June 15, 2026. Following termination of the Lilly Agreement, including the prior termination of the CNS disease program effective in November 2025, we do not expect …
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
•We may encounter significant challenges in transitioning development, regulatory, manufacturing and commercialization responsibilities for VEPPANU (vepdegestrant) from Arvinas and Pfizer, and our reliance on third parties for supply, manufacturing and ongoing development activities could adversely …
prominent safety warning), limit use of the product, and/or result in litigation. Any of these events could have a negative impact on our business.
Apart from our discovery efforts, we continue to seek to broaden and diversify our product portfolio through acquisition or in-licensing of a product. This strategy is dependent on our ability to successfully identify and acquire or in-license relevant product candidates. In July 2022, we entered in…
The acquisition, asset purchase and in-licensing of products and product candidates is a highly competitive area, and many other companies are pursuing the same or similar product candidates to those that we may consider attractive. In particular, larger companies with more well-established and dive…
of this strategy depends partly upon our ability to identify, select and acquire or in-license promising product candidates and technologies. The process of proposing, negotiating and implementing a license or acquisition of a product candidate is lengthy and complex, and we may be unable to in-lice…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Apart from our discovery efforts, we continue to seek to broaden and diversify our product portfolio through acquisition or in-licensing of a product. This strategy is dependent on our ability to successfully identify and acquire or in-license relevant product candidates. In July 2022, we entered in…
•potential failure of the due diligence process to identify significant problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired or licensed product candidate or technology, including problems, liabilities or
other shortcomings or challenges with respect to intellectual property, product quality, partner disputes or issues and other legal and financial contingencies and known and unknown liabilities;
obtained in the course of patient recruitment for clinical trials, creating fraudulent data in our preclinical studies or clinical trials or illegal misappropriation of drug product, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. See “Business – Government Regul…
We are also subject to the risk that a person or government could allege such fraud or other misconduct, even if none occurred. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmenta…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
As previously disclosed in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026, on May 5, 2026, the Company entered into a Credit and Security Agreement with MidCap Financial Trust providing for a revolving credit facility with an initial maximum borrowing capacity of $4…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice