RYES — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RYES's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-03-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +10 | −6 | 0 | 49 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 111 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-15
On May 7, 2026, the Court has denied the Company's Writ of Mandamus asking the Court to compel the Board to follow applicable law and grant Rise recognition of its vested right to operate the I-M Mine. The Company plans to appeal the Court's ruling in Superior Court in California. Should the Company…
In September 2024, the Company received a notice from the Community Environmental Advocates Foundation ("CEA") of intent to file a citizen suit against the Company for alleged violations of the Clean Water Act. The Company was not served with a summons and complaint filed in the citizen suit, and th…
On April 1, 2026, the Company, pursuant to an employment agreement, granted 62,500 RSUs to its CEO. The RSUs were exercised and converted to common stock of the Company.
On March 3, 2026, the Company entered into a strategic development partnership (the "Agreement") with Morgan Hughes Energy ("Morgan Hughes") to advance the I-M Mine Property as a U.S.-based gold and critical-minerals project. Under the Agreement, Morgan Hughes will work alongside Rise Gold to advanc…
Three months ended Three months ended Nine months ended Nine months ended
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-17
On March 3, 2026, subsequent to quarter end, the Company entered into a strategic development partnership (the "Agreement") with Morgan Hughes Energy ("Morgan Hughes") to advance the I-M Mine Property as a U.S.-based gold and critical-minerals project. Under the Agreement, Morgan Hughes will work al…
On May 13, 2024, the Company reported that it had submitted a Writ of Mandamus to the Superior Court of California (the "Court") asking the Court to compel the Board of Supervisors of Nevada County (the "Board of Supervisors") to follow applicable law and grant recognition of the Company's vested ri…
The non cash share based compensation is higher during the six-month period ended January 31, 2026 ("H1 2026") because more stock options, RSUs, and DSUs grants were issued during H1 2026 compared to the six-month period ended January 31, 2025 ("H1 2025"). With a larger budget available in H1 2026, …
The Company's operating results for the periods ended January 31, 2026 and 2025 are summarized as follows:
The Company had $Nil received from investing activities during H1 2026, (H1 2025 - $1,589,349 was generated mainly from proceeds from land contracted for sale).
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-15
Rise has been compelled to take court action to assert its rights to re-open the I-M Mine. On May 7, 2026, the Court has denied the Company's Writ of Mandamus asking the Court to compel the Board to follow applicable law and grant Rise recognition of its vested right to operate the I-M Mine. The Com…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-17
Rise has been compelled to take court action to assert its rights to re-open the I-M Mine. There can be no guarantee that the Company's legal actions will be successful.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice