RZLTvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of RZLT against SIC 2834 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Empresa | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RZLTEsta | $383M#7 | — | 3.3x#4 | — | — | -8.7%#2 | — | -63.7%#1 | -72.2%#1 | — | — | — |
| INDP | $426M#1 | — | 37.5x#6 | — | — | -38.8%#3 | — | -183.3%#5 | — | — | 33.1%#2 | — |
| PRTA | $423M#2 | — | 1.5x#1 | 43.6x#3 | -92.8%#3 | -99.6%#5 | -2216.4%#3 | -85.1%#3 | — | — | 0.9%#3 | — |
| SPRY | $414M#3 | — | 33.1x#5 | 4.9x#2 | -5.5%#2 | -2241.8%#7 | -212.9%#2 | -1369.1%#7 | -177.6%#2 | — | -55.6%#5 | — |
| AVIR | $413M#4 | — | 2.0x#2 | 1.2x#1 | 622.5%#1 | 6.0%#1 | -51.5%#1 | -77.4%#2 | — | — | 74.0%#1 | — |
| LRMR | $410M#5 | — | 3.2x#3 | — | — | -105.5%#6 | — | -130.1%#4 | -350.3%#3 | — | -1.1%#4 | — |
| TTRX | $409M#6 | — | 595.0x#7 | — | — | -80.6%#4 | — | -465.0%#6 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 2834). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. Esta tabla agotó el tiempo durante su construcción, por lo que cubre parte del grupo; los rangos son solo dentro de las filas mostradas y se completará en breve. Table built 2026-09-17.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice