SGRP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SGRP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +18 | −24 | ~16 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −10 | 0 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
As of March 31, 2026, the Company operated in the U.S. and Canada.
Net revenues for three months ended March 31, 2026 were $30.5 million, compared to $34.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, a decrease of $3.5 million, or 10.3%. Net revenues decreased during the quarter primarily due to lower volume in the remodel business.
U.S. net revenues totaled $27.2 million and $30.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease of $3.4 million or 11.7% is driven by a soft quarter in our remodel business.
Canada net revenues totaled $3.3 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
The Company's cost of revenues consists of its in-store labor and field management wages, related benefits, travel and other direct labor-related expenses and was 77.7% of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to 78.6% of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 202…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
As of September 30, 2025, the Company operated in the United States and Canada. During 2024, the Company strategically exited joint ventures in Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, China, Japan and India.
(1) Other one time expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2025 include legal expenses of $314K, restatement costs of $230K, and costs related to the strategic review of $415K. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 other one time expenses include legal expenses of $328K, restatement…
Net revenues for three months ended September 30, 2025 were $ 41.4 million, compared to $ 37.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, an increase of $ 3.6 million, or 9.5%. Net revenues increased in the quarter, despite the sale of Mexico, Japan, and India. This increase in revenues …
The Company's cost of revenues consists of its in-store labor and field management wages, related benefits, travel and other direct labor-related expenses and was 81.4% of net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to 77.7% of net revenues for the three months ended September…
Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2025 were $ 33.7 million, compared to $ 29.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024, an increase of $ 4.4 million, or 15.0%. The increase is primarily due to the growth in revenues compared to last year.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-12
There were no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2026, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management did not maintain effective controls related to the financial statement close process to ensure the completeness and accuracy of certain amounts and disclosures, specifically related to the preparation and review of balance sheet account reconciliations and presentation of segment disclosu…
Management did not design and implement effective controls used in the financial close process over non-recurring transactions, including accounting for the deconsolidation and sale of the international components. This material weakness resulted in errors in the calculation and presentation of the …
The Company has begun the process of, and is focused on, designing and implementing effective internal control measures to improve its internal control over financial reporting and remediate the material weakness identified above. The Company's internal control remediation efforts include the follow…
1. Implemented a modern and more efficient ERP system which went live January 1, 2025 with a parallel run in Q4 2024, and which includes modern and inherent controls and reduces the need for manual adjustments and likelihood of errors;
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice