SMBC — what changed in the latest 10-K
A section-by-section comparison of SMBC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-K · 2026-09-11 vs the prior 10-K · 2025-09-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business | Text added/removed | +51 | −55 | ~48 | 114 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +44 | −30 | ~15 | 90 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +37 | −58 | ~12 | 48 |
| Market risk (Item 7A) | Text added/removed | +3 | −3 | ~3 | 4 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Business
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-09-11
●potential imposition of new or increased tariffs or changes to existing trade policies that could affect economic activity or specific industry sectors;
For purposes of management and oversight of its operations, the Bank has organized its facilities into five regional markets. The Bank’s east region includes 24 of its facilities, one of which is limited service, which are situated in Butler, Cape Girardeau, Carter, New Madrid, Ripley, Scott, and St…
The Bank’s east and south regions, and part of the northwest region, are generally rural in nature with economies supported by manufacturing activity, agriculture (livestock, dairy, poultry, rice, timber, soybeans, wheat, melons, corn, and cotton), healthcare, and education. Large employers include …
The Bank faces strong competition in attracting deposits (its primary source of lendable funds) and originating loans. The most recent market share data by the FDIC reflected that the Bank was one of 261 bank or saving association groups located in Missouri competing for approximately $268.9 billion…
Competitors for deposits include commercial banks, credit unions, digital payment applications, money market funds, and other investment alternatives, such as mutual funds, full service and discount broker-dealers, equity markets, brokerage accounts and government securities. The Bank’s competition …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-09-11
On August 5, 2014, the Company completed its acquisition of Peoples Service Company (PSC) and its subsidiaries, Peoples Banking Company (PBC) and Peoples Bank of the Ozarks (Peoples), Nixa, Missouri, in a stock and cash transaction (the “Peoples Acquisition”). Peoples was merged into the Bank in ear…
Jackson, Gideon, Chaffee, Benton, Advance, Bloomfield, Essex, Rolla, Arnold, Oakville, Kansas City (two), Kearney, Lee’s Summit, Macon, Maryville, Boonville, Brookfield, Chillicothe (two), Smithville, St. Joseph (two), and Trenton, Missouri; Jonesboro (two), Paragould, Batesville, Searcy, Bald Knob,…
For purposes of management and oversight of its operations, the Bank has organized its facilities into five regional markets. The Bank’s east region includes 24 of its facilities, one of which is limited service, which are situated in Butler, Cape Girardeau, Carter, New Madrid, Ripley, Scott, and St…
The Bank’s east and south regions, and part of the northwest region. are generally rural in nature with economies supported by manufacturing activity, agriculture (livestock, dairy, poultry, rice, timber, soybeans, wheat, melons, corn, and cotton), healthcare, and education. Large employers include …
The Bank faces strong competition in attracting deposits (its primary source of lendable funds) and originating loans. The most recent market share data by the FDIC reflected that the Bank was one of 263 bank or saving association groups located in Missouri competing for approximately $252.2 billion…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-09-11
●demand for our products and services may decline which may lead to lower loan originations, deposits and other revenues;
Inflation and higher costs for goods, services, labor and other operating expenses could adversely affect our customers and our business. Although inflationary pressures have moderated from the elevated levels experienced in recent years, the continued uncertainty surrounding inflation, interest rat…
operations and financial condition. Furthermore, increases in employee compensation and benefits costs, occupancy, technology, insurance and other operating costs could increase our expenses and reduce our profitability. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, resu…
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU), 2016 13 “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” on June
16, 2016, which changed previous allowance for loan losses methodology to consider current expected credit losses (CECL).
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-09-11
Inflation rose sharply beginning in late 2021 to levels not seen in more than 40 years before moderating in 2023 and 2024. While inflationary pressures have eased, inflation remains above pre-2021 levels and continues to create uncertainty for our customers and for our operating costs. Small and med…
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU), 2016-13 “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” on June 16, 2016, which changed previous allowance for loan losses methodology to consider cur…
Our determination of the appropriate level of the ACL under CECL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes over time If our estimates are incorrect, the ACL may …
Our agricultural real estate loans totaled $245.0 million, or 6.1% of our loan portfolio, net, at June 30, 2025. Agricultural real estate lending involves a greater degree of risk and typically involves larger loans to single borrowers than lending on one-to-four-family residences. Payments on agric…
prices for agricultural products (both domestically and internationally) and the impact of government regulations (including changes in price supports, subsidies, and environmental regulations). In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may si…
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-09-11
Cash equivalents and time deposits. Cash equivalents and time deposits were $91.0 million at June 30, 2026, a decrease of $102.1 million, or 52.9%, as compared to June 30, 2025. The decrease was primarily utilized to fund loan generation that outpaced deposit growth during the period, which was part…
Loans. Loans, net of the ACL, were $4.3 billion at June 30, 2026, an increase of $287.9 million, or 7.1%, as compared to June 30, 2025. Gross loan balances increased by $291.2 million, or 7.1%, while the ACL attributable to outstanding loan balances increased $3.3 million, or 6.4%, as compared to Ju…
The Company noted growth primarily in 1-4 family residential real estate, agriculture real estate, multi-family real estate, commercial and industrial, non-owner occupied commercial real estate, owner occupied commercial real estate, and agriculture production loan balances. These increases were par…
Nonperforming loans (NPLs) were $27.7 million, or 0.63% of gross loans, at June 30, 2026, as compared to $23.0 million, or 0.56% of gross loans, at June 30, 2025. The year-over-year increase in nonaccrual loans was primarily attributable to three borrower relationships: one commercial relationship w…
Allowance for Credit Losses. The ACL at June 30, 2026, totaled $54.9 million, representing 1.25% of gross loans and 199% of nonperforming loans, as compared to an ACL of $51.6 million, representing 1.26% of gross loans and 224% of nonperforming loans, at June 30, 2025. The Company has estimated its …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-09-11
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were $192.9 million at June 30, 2025, an increase of $132.0 million, or 216.7%, as compared to June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily a result of organic deposit growth, in addition to growth in brokered certificates of deposits, during the per…
Investments. AFS securities were $460.8 million at June 30, 2025, an increase of $32.9 million, or 7.7%, as compared to June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to increased holdings of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities.
Loans. Loans, net of the ACL, were $4.0 billion at June 30, 2025, an increase of $251.7 million, or 6.6%, as compared to June 30, 2024. Gross loans increased by $250.7 million, while the ACL attributable to outstanding loan balances decreased $887,000, or 1.7%, as compared to June 30, 2024. See, “Al…
The increase of $250.7 million in gross loan balances, net of fair value adjustments, was attributable to growth in residential real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, drawn construction loan balances, multi-family real estate loans, and agricultural production draws. This was partially …
Allowance for Credit Losses. ACL at June 30, 2025, totaled $51.6 million, representing 1.26% of gross loans and 224% of nonperforming loans, as compared to an ACL of $52.5 million, representing 1.36% of gross loans and 786% of nonperforming loans, at June 30, 2024. The Company has estimated its expe…
Market risk (Item 7A)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-09-11
The Company’s growth strategy has included origination of fixed-rate loans, as discussed under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” above. The Company’s balance sheet remains liability sensitive, meaning liabilities are expected to reprice more quickly than earning assets as…
starting deposit discount rates, resulting in a net benefit across all declining-rate scenarios compared with less favorable results in the prior year.
Since June 30, 2025, higher market interest rates, coupled with lower repricing on savings accounts, increased the modeled premium value of the deposit portfolio at June 30, 2026. This benefit was partially offset by the negative impact of higher rates on the modeled value of fixed-rate loans and bo…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-09-11
computations do not consider any reactions that the Bank may undertake in response to changes in interest rates. These projected changes should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results in any of the aforementioned interest rate changes.
The Company’s growth strategy has included origination of fixed-rate loans, as discussed under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” above. Our fixed rate loan portfolio and the behavior of fixed-rate borrowers in a higher interest rate environment, especially over the course…
against the risk of rising interest rates, to $60 million in fiscal 2025, as compared to $40 million in similar interest rate swaps outstanding at June 30, 2024. $10 million of this additional notional amount is forward starting in the second quarter of fiscal 2026. The Company continues to manage i…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice