SYM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SYM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-02-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +34 | −25 | ~23 | 42 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | −1 | ~3 | 8 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −5 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended March 28, 2026 and March 29, 2025
Systems revenue increased during the six months ended March 28, 2026, as compared to the six months ended March 29, 2025, due to additional revenue generated from the 2025 Walmart MAA and there being 70 Systems in Deployment during the six months ended March 28, 2026, as compared to 46 Systems in De…
The increase in Software Maintenance and Support revenue is due to 52 Operational Systems which are under Software Maintenance and Support contracts for the six months ended March 28, 2026, as compared to 37 Operational Systems which were under Software Maintenance and Support contracts for the six …
The increase in Operation Services revenue is attributable to an increase in the number of Operational Systems where we are performing Operation Services for the six months ended March 28, 2026, as compared to the six months ended March 29, 2025, partially offset by a decrease in training services p…
The following table sets forth our gross profit for the three months ended March 28, 2026 and March 29, 2025:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-04
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024
December 28, 2024. As we continue to increase the number of Operational Systems, an increase in the number of Operation Services contracts is expected.
The following table sets forth our gross profit for the three months ended December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024:
Systems gross profit increased $37.4 million for the three months ended December 27, 2025, as compared to the three months ended December 28, 2024. The increase in Systems gross profit is primarily driven by 57 Systems in Deployment during the three months ended March 29, 2025, as compared to 44 Sys…
The increase in Software Maintenance and Support gross profit is driven by the revenue from the additional Operational Systems which are under Software Maintenance and Support contracts for the three months ended December 27, 2025, as compared to the three months ended December 28, 2024, while costs…
Controls & procedures
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-04
discrepancies in the recognition of revenue during the year ended September 27, 2025. These deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting constituted a material weakness as of December 27, 2025.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Certain of our directors or officers have made elections to participate in, and are participating in, our Incentive Compensation Plan, ESPP or our defined-contribution benefit plan under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and have may, and may from time to time make, elect…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-02-04
On December 8, 2025, Charles Kane, a member of our board of directors, entered into a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Mr. Kane’s Rule 10b5-1 trading plan provides for the sale of up to a maximum of 122,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock that he received following the ve…
On December 8, 2025, entities related to Todd Krasnow, a member of our board of directors, entered into a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Mr. Kane’s Rule 10b5-1 trading plan provides for the sale of up to a maximum of 108,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock for which Mr.…
On December 8, 2025, Daniela Rus, a member of our board of directors, entered into a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Ms. Rus’ Rule 10b5-1 trading plan provides for the sale of up to a maximum of 11,024 shares of our Class A Common Stock that she received following the vesti…
On December 10, 2025, Miriam Ort, our Chief Human Resources Officer, entered into a trading plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Ms. Ort’s Rule 10b5-1 trading plan provides for the sale of up to a maximum of 15,392 shares of our Class A Common Stock that she received following the vesti…
Certain of our directors or officers have made elections to participate in, and are participating in, our Incentive Compensation Plan, ESPP or our defined-contribution benefit plan under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and have may, and may from time to time make, elect…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice