TEM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TEM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +48 | −4 | ~5 | 25 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Controls & procedures, Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-30
The proposed acquisition may not be completed, and the merger agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms.
The proposed acquisition is subject to a number of conditions that must be satisfied or waived prior to the completion of the proposed acquisition, including, among others, the approval by Personalis stockholders of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the receipt of requisite regulatory appr…
These conditions to the completion of the proposed acquisition may not be satisfied or waived in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the proposed acquisition may be delayed or may not be completed. In addition, if the proposed acquisition is not completed by April 20, 2027, which date may b…
Failure to complete the proposed acquisition could negatively impact the price of shares of our Class A common stock, as well as our business and results of operations.
If the proposed acquisition is not completed for any reason, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected and, without realizing any of the benefits of having completed the proposed acquisition, we would be subject to a number of risks, including:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Eric Lefkofsky, Chief Executive Officer, Founder and Director
This Rule 10b5-1 trading plan provides for sales of (i) 20,562 shares of Class A common stock and (ii) up to 100% of the net number of shares received upon vesting of an aggregate of 47,180 RSUs and time-vesting PSUs, after giving effect to the withholding or sale of a portion of such shares to sati…
Trading under this Rule 10b5-1 trading plan will not commence until completion of the required cooling off period under Rule 10b5-1 and the conclusion of Mr. Lefkofsky’s prior Rule 10b5-1 trading plan.
Represents the adoption of a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan by Blue Media, LLC and Gray Media, LLC, each an entity controlled by Mr. Lefkofsky, and Lefkofsky Family Foundation and Vas.org Foundation, of each of which Mr. Lefkofsky is a trustee, providing for the sale of up to 4,590,000 shares of Class A c…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice