THM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of THM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −8 | ~10 | 13 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12
On April 13, 2026, the Company announced that it had awarded Livengood Gold Project Feasibility Study Phase 1 contracts to a consortium comprised of BBA Consultants USA LP, (“BBA”), Hatch Ltd, (“Hatch”), Newfields Mining Design and Technical Services LLC (“Newfields”) Resource Development Associates…
The Company also announced that core drilling to support the feasibility study had commenced. Alloy Drilling Inc., an Alaska-based drilling contractor with operations throughout the western United States, mobilized two rigs to Livengood and began drilling large-diameter PQ core holes in April within…
The metallurgical testwork on this fresh core will focus on evaluating opportunities to enhance gold recoveries and overall project economics in the context of a substantially higher gold price than the $1,680 per ounce assumption utilized in the Company’s prior study.
BBA, Newfields, JDS and RDA each bring industry-leading expertise and Livengood Gold Project experience as co-authors of the Company’s 2017 and 2023 Pre-Feasibility Studies. Hatch has been added to the team to provide additional expertise in POX processing, metallurgical optimization and trade-off s…
Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
The Company had net income of $2,274,143 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to a net loss of $669,068 for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Mineral property expenditures were $254,108 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $148,487 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase of $105,621 was primarily due to increased activity on the Livengood Gold Project of $53,242 and increased expenses for land-related leg…
Professional fees were $129,535 and $32,242 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively. The increase of $97,293 is due primarily to increased fees for legal of $49,926, recruiting of $25,110, and timing variances for accounting and auditing services of $22,257.
Excluding share-based costs of $20,419 and $14,265 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively, wages and benefits were $259,060 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to $189,558 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase of $69,502 was primar…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice