TMC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TMC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +70 | −93 | ~20 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | ~1 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −7 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +3 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Our mission is to build a carefully managed shared stock of metal (a “metal commons”) that can be used, recovered and reused for generations to come. We believe significant quantities of newly mined metal are required because existing metal stocks are insufficient to meet rapidly rising demand.
The four metals and REEs contained in the polymetallic nodules are on the U.S. Department of Interior’s “2025 List of Critical Minerals”, with end-uses in strategic sectors including semiconductors and AI data centers, steel manufacturing, the defense and marine industrial base. Nickel was included …
We are now in the development stage following the release of the results of a pre-feasibility study on one of our development areas in a report titled S-K 1300 Prefeasibility Study for NORI Area D Technical Report Summary, dated August 4, 2025, prepared by AMC Consultants Pty Ltd. and other qualifie…
Two parallel regulatory regimes exist to regulate deep seabed exploration and extraction activities in the high seas. The United States adopted the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act of 1980 (“DSHMRA”), a U.S. domestic statute administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce through the National …
We continue focusing on advancing our commercial production strategy under the DSHMRA regime. In April 2025, our wholly owned subsidiary, The Metals Company USA, LLC (“TMC USA”), submitted two exploration license applications (covering 187,017 square kilometers in the CCZ referred to as TMC USA-A an…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
These four metals contained in the polymetallic nodules are critical for energy, defense, manufacturing and infrastructure. Our resource definition work to date shows that nodules in our contract areas represent the world’s largest undeveloped resource of the four critical metals contained in nodule…
We are now in the evaluation stage following the release of S-K 1300 NORI Area D Technical Report on August 4, 2025 where the Company declared mining reserves for a seafloor polymetallic nodule project. We have not yet obtained an exploitation license, a commercial recovery permit and all other rela…
The International Seabed Authority (“ISA”), comprised of 170 countries and the European Union, established regulations over deep-sea exploration activities of their nationals, pursuant to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”). The ISA has adopted exploration regulations and …
We continue to be focused on advancing our commercial production strategy under the U.S.-based DSHMRA regime. In April 2025, our wholly owned subsidiary, The Metals Company USA, LLC, or TMC USA, submitted two exploration license applications (covering 187,017 square kilometers in the CCZ referred to…
At the same time as we pursue the U.S. regulatory pathway, we continue to preserve our rights and comply with all our contractual obligations under the ISA system. While the ISA does not have jurisdiction over activities conducted under the regulatory authority of the United States, we maintain two …
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Regulations related to emissions limits, such as cap-and-trade schemes and carbon taxes, would likely increase our future cost of operations, energy purchase, and equipment selection in addition to costs associated with potential carbon tax and/or purchase of carbon offsets. It is difficult to estim…
We are working on a plan for continuous reduction of emissions and aiming to develop operations with near zero emissions. When selecting the location of our onshore plant, one of our requirements is access to renewable energy as our metallurgical process will be the most energy intensive step in our…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Both the ISA and the U.S. regime under DSHMRA have not yet been used for commercial production of seafloor polymetallic nodules. To date, NOAA has not issued a commercial recovery permit, and while the legal framework is established, it has not yet been applied to the full lifecycle of a seabed mini…
In addition, permitting under DSHMRA will subject us to a complex regulatory system in the United States which we are currently analyzing to determine applicability and how compliance will impact our development plans and potential commercial operations. For example, we will be subject to the Mercha…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal controls that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As previously disclosed in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, management identified a material weakness in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls over the accounting for significant non-routine transactions that resulted from the inadequate and untimely involvement of stakeholders an…
This material weakness resulted in errors in the financial statements and related disclosures in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2023, and for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and nine months ended September 30, 2023. See Note 22 to the audited consolidated finan…
In order to remediate this material weakness, during 2024, we developed a policy to assist with the identification of significant, non-routine transactions and to define the processes to follow in addressing the accounting and reporting requirements of these transactions. In addition, we rolled out …
We will continue to review the effectiveness of our newly implemented controls and make improvements as warranted. This is no assurance, however, that these control modifications will ultimately have the intended effects.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Except as set forth below, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.
On January 16, 2026, American Metal Inc. and American Metal Resources LLC filed a civil claim in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Vancouver Registry, captioned American Metal Inc. and American Metal Resources LLC v. TMC The Metals Company Inc. and The Metals Company USA LLC, No. S260335. The n…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Except as set forth below, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings (refer to Note 17 – Contingent Liabilities, in the Company’s third quarter 2025 interim financial statements in Item 1).
On November 8, 2024, a shareholder filed a putative class action against us and certain executives in federal district court for the Central District of California, captioned Lin v. TMC The Metals Company Inc., Gerard Barron, and Craig Shesky. The complaint alleges that all defendants violated Secti…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
On May 11, 2026, the Company entered into the Contract for Development Work and Commercial Production (the “Agreement”) with Allseas Deepsea Marine Contractors, a subsidiary of Allseas Group S.A. (“Allseas”).
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company will issue to Allseas Group S.A. 7,377,835 common shares (the “Shares”) in settlement of the March 31, 2026 amount owing of $32.1 million for development work previously performed by Allseas Group S.A. and its affiliates in connection with the nodule collection…
The Shares will be issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving a public offering. Allseas Group S.A. is a sophisticated investor and the Company’s largest strategic shareholder. The Shares…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice