TNGX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TNGX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +53 | −39 | ~12 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +3 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-11
We are currently focused on clinical development of two MTAP-deleted selective PRMT5 inhibitors: vopimetostat (TNG462) for non-CNS cancers, both as a monotherapy and in combination with RAS inhibitors, and TNG456, our next-generation, brain-penetrant PRMT5 inhibitor, for CNS cancers, including GBM. …
In June 2026, we reported initial safety and efficacy data from our ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial of vopimetostat in combination with Revolution Medicines' RAS(ON) inhibitors in patients with MTAP-deleted and RAS-mutant metastatic PDAC.
As of the cutoff date of May 28, 2026, 59 patients with previously treated MTAP-deleted and RAS-mutant PDAC or NSCLC were treated with a vopimetostat-based combination with either daraxonrasib (n=20 PDAC; n=5 NSCLC) or zoldonrasib (n=34 PDAC). All patients had advanced disease, including 70% with li…
In the vopimetostat plus daraxonrasib dose escalation arm, patients received either vopimetostat 200 mg or 250 mg QD plus daraxonrasib 100 mg QD. As of the data cutoff date of May 28, 2026, 12 patients with PDAC and three patients with NSCLC were response evaluable with at least 14 weeks of follow u…
The vopimetostat plus daraxonrasib combination was generally well-tolerated across dose levels. Most adverse events were grade one or two in severity, and grade three adverse events were observed and included thrombocytopenia, acneiform rash, stomatitis/mucositis and fatigue. There were no related g…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
We are currently focused on clinical development of two MTAP-deleted selective PRMT5 inhibitors: vopimetostat (TNG462) for non-CNS cancers, both as a monotherapy and in combination with RAS inhibitors, and TNG456, our next-generation, brain-penetrant PRMT5 inhibitor, for CNS cancers, including gliob…
We are focused on evaluating vopimetostat as a monotherapy and in combination with RAS inhibitors, given the overlap in patient populations, robust preclinical data supporting potential strong combination effect in clinical trials, and favorable clinical efficacy, durability, and safety profiles obs…
Given the differentiated profile of vopimetostat enabling the potential for efficacious and tolerable RAS inhibitor combinations, in March 2026, we entered into a clinical trial collaboration and supply agreement (CTCSA) with Erasca, Inc., or Erasca, to evaluate vopimetostat in combination with Eras…
Due to an increased focus on our PRMT5 pipeline, we are deprioritizing future development and resources allocated to TNG260. TNG260, a first-in-class CoREST inhibitor that we recently evaluated in a Phase 1/2 trial, showed limited clinical benefit in patients and we plan to shut down the clinical tr…
Since the Company's inception, we have focused primarily on organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, discovering product candidates, securing related intellectual property, and conducting research and development activities for our programs. To date, we have funded ou…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-11
Aggregate Number of Shares of Common Stock to be Purchased or Sold Pursuant to Trading Arrangement
(1) This trading arrangement, identified as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c).
(2) This trading arrangement permits transactions through and including the earlier to occur of (a) the completion of all purchases or sales or (b) the date listed in the table. This trading arrangement, identified as a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangement” only permits transactions upon expiration of t…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice