TROX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TROX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +57 | −33 | ~34 | 33 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~6 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Sequentially, revenue increased 14% in the second quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2026 due to higher average selling prices, including mix and higher sales volumes of TiO2 and zircon. TiO2 revenues increased 14%, driven by a 9% increase in sales volume and a 5% increase in average s…
•the net unfavorable impact of 3 points due to higher production costs, including unfavorable idle facility and lower of costs or market charges, and higher freight costs and,
Selling, general and administrative expenses remained consistent as compared to the same period of 2025 which was primarily due to a $6 million increase in employee costs partially offset by a $4 million decrease in amortization expense due to certain intangible assets which have been fully amortize…
Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025
(1)EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as % of Net Sales are Non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the “Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures” section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of these measures and a…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Sequentially, revenue increased 4% in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the fourth quarter of 2025 primarily due to higher sales volumes of TiO2 and zircon and higher average selling prices of TiO2 including mix partly offset by a decrease in sales volumes of pig iron. TiO2 revenues increased 7%…
•the unfavorable impact of 2 points due to increased cost structures, higher idle facility and lower of costs or net realizable value charges and,
Selling, general and administrative expenses of $71 million decreased $3 million compared to the same period of 2025 primarily due to a $5 million decrease in professional services partially offset by a $2 million increase in employee costs.
Other comprehensive loss was $22 million in the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to other comprehensive income of $40 million in the three months ended March 31, 2025. The change is primarily due to the unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustments of $26 million in the three mon…
The following table presents our liquidity as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025:
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
interest-rate swap agreements were less than $1 million and $1 million, respectively, of which less than $1 million and $1 million was reclassified from "Accumulated other comprehensive loss" to interest expense. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the net amounts recorded in interest …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Balance Sheet. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the amounts recorded in interest expense related to the interest-rate swap agreements were $1 million and $2 million, respectively, of which less than $1 million and less than $1 million, respectively, was reclassified from "Accumula…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice