TTGT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TTGT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +43 | −26 | ~23 | 55 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~5 | 22 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $8.1 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit after the impairment charge was $1.1 million.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $3.7 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the Bluefin reporting unit after the $3.7 million impairment charge.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit was $26.4 million prior to the reorganization.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $26.4 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill in the Brand to Demand reporting unit after the impairment charge as of March 31, 2026.
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, there was no goodwill impairment recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Intelligence & Advisory reporting unit on a post-reorganization basis was $1.1 million as of March 31, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $8.1 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Canalys reporting unit after the impairment charge was $1.1 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, an 8.…
increase in the weighted average EBITDA margin would have resulted in no impairment in the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, a 100 basis-point decrease in the discount rate used for the goodwill assessment over this reporting unit would have decreased the goodwill impairmen…
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $3.7 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill remaining in the Bluefin reporting unit after the $3.7 million impairment charge. For the three months ended March …
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, no goodwill impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. The carrying value of goodwill in the Industry Dive reporting unit was $26.4 million prior to the reorganization. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, a 10% decreas…
Based on the quantitative fair value testing, a goodwill impairment of $26.4 million was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2026. There was no carrying value of goodwill in the Brand to Demand reporting unit after the impairment charge as of March 31, 2026. For the three months ended…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice