UFPI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of UFPI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +54 | −30 | ~41 | 38 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
●Our net sales increased 3% compared to the second quarter of 2025, consisting of a 1% increase in organic unit sales (excluding growth from acquisitions within the last 12 months) and a 2% increase attributable to acquisitions. Organic unit sales increased 4% in our packaging segment, partially off…
●Our gross profit decreased by $23 million, or 7%, compared to the same period of the prior year. By segment, gross profit decreased by $10 million in Construction, $10 million in Packaging, and $3 million in Corporate, while Retail increased by $1 million and All Other remained flat. The overall de…
●Our cash flows from operations were $61 million in the first six months of 2026 compared to $113 million during the first six months of 2025. The $52 million decline resulted from a decrease in net earnings and non-cash expenses of $50 million and an increase in our investment in net working capita…
Lumber prices increased during the second quarter of 2026, after declining during the first quarter. Commodity lumber costs increased due to mill curtailments and higher duties on Canadian lumber, partially offset by weak overall demand resulting from lower consumer sentiment and greater economic un…
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), which the U.S. administration relied on to impose certain tariffs, does not authorize the administration to impose tariffs. As a result of this ruling, the U.S. Court of International Trade…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
●Our net sales decreased 8% compared to the first quarter of 2025, which was comprised of a 1% decrease in selling prices and a 7% decrease in unit sales. The overall decrease in our selling prices is primarily due to more competitive pricing in our Site Built business unit resulting from weak consu…
●Our gross profits decreased by $32 million, or 12%, compared to the same period of the prior year. By segment, gross profits decreased by $13 million in Construction, $9 million in Packaging, $1 million in Retail, and $10 million in Corporate, while All Other increased $1 million. The overall decre…
●Our cash flows used in operations were $104 million in the first three months of 2026 compared to $109 million during the first three months of 2025. The $5 million improvement resulted from a change in our investment in net working capital which was $36 million lower in 2026 than 2025, offset by a…
Lumber prices in 2026 remain lower due to overall weak demand in the end markets that primarily consume softwood lumber – new housing, housing repair and remodel activity, and industrial (including packaging). Recent sequential increases are primarily due to recent mill capacity curtailments as they…
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), which the U.S. administration relied on to impose certain tariffs, does not authorize the administration to impose tariffs. As a result of this ruling, the U.S. Court of International Trade…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice