VSTM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of VSTM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +60 | −34 | ~10 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +2 | −1 | ~2 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +4 | −1 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
ØIn June 2026, we announced positive updated results from the RAMP 205 Phase 1b/2a recommended phase 2 dose cohort of 29 patients evaluating avutometinib plus defactinib in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). As of the June 5, …
safety profile with no new safety signals. Nine patients remain on treatment, and follow-up continues as survival data matures.
ØIn July 2026, updated data from the RAMP 201 Japan study were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO). As of May 29, 2026, 16 efficacy-evaluable patients with recurrent LGSOC had received avutometinib plus defactinib, with a median follow up of 12.4 mo…
VS-7375 is a potential best-in-class, potent, and selective oral KRAS G12D dual ON/OFF inhibitor. VS-7375 has a differentiated profile compared to other RAS inhibitors. Based on preclinical data, VS-7375 offers dual, potent inhibition of both ON and OFF states of KRAS G12D. We believe this correlate…
In April 2026 we branded the trials as the VS-7375 TARGET-D Clinical Trial Program. TARGET-D 101 (VS-7375-101) is a Phase 1/2 dose escalation, dose expansion and combination-evaluation trial. In the TARGET-D 101 Phase 1/2 study, the Company cleared multiple monotherapy dose levels, including the 120…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
VS-7375 is a potential best-in-class, potent, and selective oral KRAS G12D dual ON/OFF inhibitor. VS-7375 has a differentiated profile compared to other RAS inhibitors. Based on preclinical data, VS-7375 offers dual, potent inhibition of both ON and OFF states of KRAS G12D. We believe this correlate…
In the Phase 1/2 study the Company cleared multiple monotherapy dose levels with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and no major toxicities and continues to dose-escalate. The Company also cleared multiple dose levels in combination with cetuximab with no DLTs and higher doses are being evaluated. T…
ØIn April 2026 we branded the trials as the VS-7375 TARGET-D Clinical Trial Program. In the ongoing TARGET-D 101 (VS-7375-101) Phase 1/2 dose escalation, dose expansion and combination-evaluation trial, we are now evaluating the 1200 mg daily dose (“QD”). We are also evaluating VS-7375 at 900 mg QD …
ØWe have initiated three Phase 2 registration-directed trials, including:
1.TARGET-D 201 to evaluate VS-7375 at the 900 mg QD both as monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab in patients with second-line PDAC. The study is also evaluating VS-7375 and cetuximab in the first-line PDAC setting.
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
of June 30, 2026, an immaterial amount of our total liabilities was denominated in currencies other than the functional currency.
As of June 30, 2026, we have borrowed $75.0 million under the Note Purchase Agreement. The Notes under the Note Purchase Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to the sum of (i) the greater of the Term SOFR (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) and 4.29%, and (ii) 3.71%, which is sub…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
As of March 31, 2026, we have borrowed $75.0 million under the Note Purchase Agreement. The Notes under the Note Purchase Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to the sum of (i) the greater of the Term SOFR (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) and 4.29%, and (ii) 3.71%, which is su…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
As required under Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (ASC 205-40), we have the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about our ability to meet our future financial obligations as they become due within…
To address these conditions, we expect to finance our operations with our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments and through one or more potential sources of additional liquidity, including sufficient future net product revenues, potential future milestones and royalties received pursuant t…
assessment and do not alleviate the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient net product revenues or obtain additional capital on favorable terms or at all.
If we are unable to raise capital when needed, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our commercial efforts for AVMAPKI FAKZYNJA CO-PACK or our other research and development activities for our product candidates, or ultimately not be able to continue as a going concern.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
As required under Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (ASC 205-40), we have the responsibility to evaluate whether conditions and/or events raise substantial doubt about our ability to meet our future financial obligations as they become due within…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice