WETH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of WETH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +32 | −16 | ~23 | 18 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
● Net income stayed flat at $2.2 million in the second quarter of 2026 and 2025
Three Months Ended June 30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
We generated revenue of $14.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, an increase of $1.6 million, or 12.9%, compared to $12.4 million in the same period of last year. This was due to an increase of 7.8% in sales volume, and 6.0% positive impact from exchange rate due to appreciation of RM…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, revenue from the PRC domestic market increased by $1.2 million, or 14.3%, as a combined result of (i) an increase of 7.3% in sales volume in all types of touchscreen products in the PRC market, (ii) an increase of 0.3% in the average selling price of our pro…
As for the RMB selling price, the increase of 0.3% was mainly due to the higher demand of higher selling priced products of touchscreen machines such as automotive touchscreens and industrial control computer touchscreens in the PRC market, yet the overall price change was not significant during the…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
● Net income was $3.9 million, an increase of 50.0% compared to $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2025
(in US Dollar millions, except percentage) Three-Month Period Ended
Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
We generated revenue of $16.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, an increase of $1.0 million, or 6.5%, compared to $15.3 million in the same period of last year. This was due to an increase of 0.1% in sales volume, an increase of 1.5% in the average selling price of our products , an…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, revenue from the PRC domestic market increased by $0.7 million, or 6.8%, as a combined result of: (i) an increase of 2.7% in the average RMB selling price of our products, and 4.8% positive impact from exchange rate due to appreciation of RMB against US dol…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice