WLDN — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of WLDN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −10 | ~19 | 28 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
(1)Percentages are expressed as a percentage of contract revenue and may not total due to rounding.
Contract revenue. Consolidated contract revenue increased $57.6 million, or 33.2%, in the three months ended July 3, 2026, compared to the three months ended July 4, 2025, as a result of increased demand for our services in both our Energy segment and our Engineering and Consulting segment.
Contract revenue in our Energy segment increased $55.9 million, or 38.1%, in the three months ended July 3, 2026, compared to the three months ended July 4, 2025, primarily as a result of higher revenues across all of our service offerings, combined with incremental revenues from our acquisition of …
Direct costs of contract revenue. Direct costs of consolidated contract revenue increased $38.4 million, or 36.5%, for the three months ended July 3, 2026, compared to the three months ended July 4, 2025, primarily as a result of the increased volume in contract revenues as described above. As a per…
Income (loss) from operations. Operating income increased 67.0% to $19.7 million for the three months ended July 3, 2026, compared to an operating income of $11.8 million for the three months ended July 4, 2025, as a result of the factors noted above.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
Contract revenue. Consolidated contract revenue increased $2.7 million, or 1.8%, in the three months ended April 3, 2026, compared to the three months ended April 4, 2025, as a result of increased demand for our services in both our Energy segment and our Engineering and Consulting segment while bei…
Contract revenue in our Energy segment increased $1.7 million, or 1.4%, in the three months ended April 3, 2026, compared to the three months ended April 4, 2025, primarily as a result of increased productivity under our energy efficiency and electrification utility programs, combined with increased…
Direct costs of contract revenue. Direct costs of consolidated contract revenue decreased $2.8 million, or 2.9%, for the three months ended April 3, 2026, compared to the three months ended April 4, 2025, primarily as a result of the change of mix in contract revenues as described above, while being…
Income (loss) from operations. Operating income increased 3.6% to $7.3 million for the three months ended April 3, 2026, compared to an operating income of $7.0 million for the three months ended April 4, 2025, as a result of the factors noted above, including being partially offset by the impact of…
the absence of a one-time charge related to a facility lease modification that we had in the first quarter of fiscal year 2025.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice