WULF — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of WULF's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-08 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-10
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +109 | −110 | ~8 | 12 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~4 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −8 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
We are a vertically integrated owner, developer, and operator of digital infrastructure assets in the United States, purpose-built to support HPC workloads, including AI, machine learning, and advanced cloud applications.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, HPC leasing revenue represented a majority of total revenue for the first time, reflecting the continued ramp of long-term contracted capacity at the Lake Mariner Data Campus.
The Company has undergone a deliberate strategic transition toward HPC hosting as its primary business. While TeraWulf historically operated bitcoin mining facilities and leveraged flexible compute loads to support early infrastructure development, the Company has begun to curtail and repurpose port…
Our strategy is grounded in controlling infrastructure at utility scale and pairing compute-optimized facilities with reliable, long-duration power resources. By controlling land use through ownership or long-term ground leases, together with interconnection rights, electrical and cooling infrastruc…
This infrastructure-first approach enables TeraWulf to serve Tier-1 counterparties while maintaining operational control, development flexibility, and disciplined capital allocation.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
We are a vertically integrated owner and operator of digital infrastructure assets in the United States, purpose-built to support high-performance computing (“HPC”) workloads. We develop, own, and operate large-scale, low-carbon datacenter campuses anchored by long-duration, cost-efficient power res…
Our primary operations are centered at the Lake Mariner Campus, strategically located on the shores of Lake Ontario. Developed on the site of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant, this expansive facility is designed for scalable growth, with 500 MW and up to 750 MW with targeted transmission upgr…
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the Lake Mariner Campus has 245 MW of energized capacity supporting bitcoin mining infrastructure and has energized 22.5 MW of HPC leasing capacity. TeraWulf remains on track to deliver an additional 50 MW of HPC leasing capacity under its datacenter lease ag…
On May 21, 2025 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in Beowulf Electricity & Data LLC, Beowulf E&D (MD) LLC, and Beowulf E&D (NY) LLC (collectively, “Beowulf E&D”). The fair value of total consideration for the transaction was approximately $54.6 million, …
On August 12, 2025, the Company entered into a long term ground lease for approximately 183 acres in Lansing, New York (the “Cayuga Site”). The Cayuga Site, which, upon completion of permitting and site development, has the potential to support up to 400 MW of incremental capacity. The Cayuga Site p…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
On May 7, 2026, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent, which provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) with aggregate commit…
From the closing date to the earliest commencement date to occur under the Fluidstack HPC Leases (the “First Commencement Date”), borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either (i) a Term SOFR determined by reference to the secur…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
The Company has two operating segments: “Digital Asset Mining,” consisting of providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator and “HPC Leasing,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to third parties for HPC operations. The reportable segments are identified based on…
The Company’s operations are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision–making group (“CODM”), which is composed of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Technology Officer and Chief Strategy Officer, to assess performance and allocate resources. The CODM uses segment profit…
Prior to the third quarter of 2025, the Company had one segment, Digital Asset Mining, such that the CODM was regularly provided only with consolidated expense data, as presented in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The CODM managed this segment using consolidated net loss as the …
The following table presents revenue and segment profit (loss) by reportable segment for the periods presented (in thousands):
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment profit to loss before income taxes and equity in net income of investee included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the years months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice