XTGRF — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of XTGRF's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2012-11-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2012-08-09
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +16 | −14 | ~12 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 9 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2012-11-13
Our company’s loss for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $6,501 as compared to a net loss of $2,014,669 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, reduction in the quarterly loss of $2,008,168.
Our company’s basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $0.00 compared to a net loss of $0.05 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 44,650,362 for the three months ended September 30, 20…
We incurred expenses of $797,538 in the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to $1,827,795 in the three months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $1,030,257. The decrease in expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2012 can be primarily attributed to a decrease of $906,255 …
General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) were $236,542 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, as compared to $374,280 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, included consulting fees, stock-based compensation, legal, auditor and regulatory filing fees, travel and promotional expens…
Amortization for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $76,205 as compared to $62,469 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $13,736, due to equipment additions in 2011.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2012-08-09
Our company’s basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.06 compared to a net loss of $0.03 per share for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 44,658,703 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to …
We incurred expenses of $2,351,173 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $1,493,374 in the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $857,799. The increase in expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2012 can be primarily attributed to an increase of $528,993 in exploratio…
General and administrative expenses (“G&A”) were $623,505 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to $321,739 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, included consulting fees, stock-based compensation, legal, auditor and regulatory filing fees, travel and promotional expenses. The in…
Amortization for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was $76,204 as compared to $49,164 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $27,040, due to equipment additions in 2011.
Exploration results during the quarter were primarily focused on our Kibi project including drilling of 4,444 meters and trenching of 1,352 meters, while 7,883 drill assays and 758 trenching assays were received from the lab.
Legal proceedings
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2012-11-13
Except for the foregoing, neither our company nor any of our subsidiaries was a party or of which any of our property was the subject in any material pending legal proceedings that exceeds 10% of our current assets and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis during the quarter ended September 30, 2…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2012-08-09
the subcontractor in 2008. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we settled the lawsuit by paying the subcontractor $108,000 in return for the shares previously issued which we subsequently cancelled.
Except for the foregoing, neither our company nor any of our subsidiaries was a party or of which any of our property was the subject in any material pending legal proceedings that exceeds 10% of our current assets and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis during the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice