ACTU — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ACTU's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +22 | −50 | ~20 | 19 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
We have exclusively licensed elraglusib, a proprietary and patent protected GSK-3 inhibitor developed in a collaboration between The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois-Chicago (“UIC”) and Northwestern University (“NU”).
We believe elraglusib represents a “pipeline in a molecule” with a broad opportunity for us to potentially initiate and advance multiple drug development programs around our lead asset based on its multimodal mechanisms of action, data emerging from completed or ongoing clinical studies and nonclini…
To date, we have treated over 500 patients with elraglusib as an IV injection (“Elraglusib Injection”) in Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies. We have also developed an oral formulation of elraglusib (“Elraglusib Oral Tablet”), which we believe will allow us to pursue a number of cancer indications with a m…
In addition, we have generated promising results with a once weekly IV infusion of elraglusib in first-line treatment of patients with mPDAC. Our Phase 2 study in mPDAC, known as Actuate-1801 Part 3B study, is a randomized, controlled Phase 2 study that enrolled 286 patients with no prior systemic t…
·Statistically significant benefit in mOS in the elraglusib/GnP arm vs GnP control arm (mOS 10.1 months vs. 7.2 months, p=0.02, HR=0.62);
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Since our inception in 2015, we have focused substantially all of our resources on organizing and staffing our Company, business planning, raising capital, establishing and maintaining our intellectual property portfolio, conducting research, preclinical studies, and clinical trials, establishing ar…
We have exclusively licensed a portfolio of GSK-3 inhibitors developed in a collaboration between The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois-Chicago (“UIC”) and Northwestern University (“NU”). Elraglusib is the lead investigational product in our portfolio and is being evaluated in a Phase …
Elraglusib represents a broad opportunity for us to potentially initiate and advance multiple drug development programs around our lead asset based on data emerging from completed or ongoing Phase 1/2 trials and non-clinical biological, cellular, and animal data. Animal tumor model data, Phase 1/2 c…
Our lead clinical program, referred to as Actuate-1801, is focused on evaluating the intravenous (“IV”) injection solution of elraglusib (“Elraglusib Injection”) for the treatment of first-line mPDAC. The Actuate-1801 trial is a randomized, controlled Phase 2 trial of elraglusib in combination with …
Topline data announced in May 2025 in the pre-specified safety population as of March 27, 2025 showed that the trial met its primary endpoint of improved mOS in patients in the elraglusib/GnP combination arm versus the GnP control arm. The analysis of topline data demonstrated treatment with elraglu…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice