ADACU — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ADACU's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-01-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −7 | ~8 | 7 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we had a net income of $970,782, which consists of interest earned on marketable securities and cash held in Trust Account of $2,024,440, offset by general and administrative costs of $1,053,658.
On December 19, 2025, we consummated the Initial Public Offering of 23,000,000 Units, which includes the full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option of 3,000,000 Units, at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $230,000,000. Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial …
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, cash used in operating activities was $419,880. Net income of $970,782 was affected by interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account of $2,024,440. Changes in operating assets and liabilities provided $633,778 of cash for operating activiti…
In connection with the Company’s assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 205-40, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern”, management has determined that the Company currently lacks the liquidity it needs to sustain operations for a reasonable period …
We have no obligations, assets or liabilities, which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-01-30
For the period from July 15, 2025 (inception) through September 30, 2025, we had a net loss of $31,329, which consists of general and administrative costs.
Until the consummation of the Initial Public Offering, our only source of liquidity was an initial purchase of Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, by the Sponsor and loans from the Sponsor.
Subsequent to the quarterly period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, on December 19, 2025, we consummated the Initial Public Offering of 23,000,000 Units, which includes the full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option of 3,000,000
Units, at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $230,000,000. Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, we consummated the sale of an aggregate of 4,000,000 Private Placement Warrants, at a price of $1.50 per Private Placement Warrant, in a private placement to the Spon…
For the period from July 15, 2025 (inception) through September 30, 2025, net cash used in operating activities was $12,416. Net loss of $31,329 was affected by the changes in accrued expenses of $18,913.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice