AGLY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AGLY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-24 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-30
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +8 | −5 | ~6 | 14 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 11 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-24
Revenues were $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Our general and administrative expenses increased from $7,225 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 to $7,575 for the three months ended June 30, 2026. The professional fees during both periods are more or less the same.
Weighted average number of ordinary shares, Basic and diluted 603,970,000 603,970,000
Revenues were $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025.
Our general and administrative expenses increased from $16,179 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $16,802 for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The professional fees during both periods are more or less the same.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Revenues were $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.
Our net loss increased from $8,954 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $9,227 for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The professional fees during both periods are more or less the same.
Since the inception of the Company, we have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flows from operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, we had net losses of $9,227 and $8,954, respectively. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,155,634. As disc…
As of March 31, 2026, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0. To date, we have financed our operations principally through borrowings from our related parties. Depending on our future operational results, we may need to conduct one or more equity or debt financings within the next 12 months.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice