AGNC — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AGNC's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-31 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +38 | −39 | ~36 | 94 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~7 | 18 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
The investment environment during the second quarter of 2026 was shaped by heightened geopolitical uncertainty as escalating rhetoric and hostilities between the United States and Iran dominated financial market performance. With ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz severely constrained, elevat…
In aggregate, Agency RMBS in the second quarter outperformed both Treasury and swap-based hedges, with performance varying meaningfully by coupon and hedge type. Higher-coupon and production-coupon Agency RMBS outperformed lower-coupon securities as rising interest rates reduced both expected supply…
Agency RMBS hedged with interest rate swaps also outperformed Treasury-hedged positions. At quarter-end, the spread differential between a current-coupon mortgage-backed security and a blend of hedges was approximately 145 basis points across the swap curve and 115 basis points across the Treasury c…
Looking forward, our outlook for Agency RMBS remains constructive. With primary mortgage rates remaining well above 6.0%, net new Agency RMBS supply is estimated to be approximately $150 billion this year, materially below expectations at the beginning of the year. Elevated mortgage rates have also …
AGNC generated total comprehensive income of $0.52 per diluted common share and an economic return on tangible common equity per share of 6.7% for the second quarter, consisting of $0.36 of dividends declared per common share during the second quarter and a $0.20 increase in tangible net book value …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
Agency RMBS performance in the first quarter of 2026 was driven by two divergent macroeconomic themes. In January and February, the Administration’s focus on reducing interest rate volatility, maintaining mortgage spread stability, and improving housing affordability drove strong performance across …
We continue to believe that many of the positive catalysts for Agency RMBS performance observed at the beginning of the year remain intact, with several improving further during the first quarter. First, mortgage spreads to benchmark rates widened significantly in March, and these wider spread level…
interest rate volatility has increased and future Federal Reserve monetary policy actions have become somewhat more uncertain, we believe that, with some form of resolution or easing of tensions in the Middle East, these factors could quickly revert to positive catalysts for Agency RMBS. As a result…
During the first quarter, Agency RMBS performance varied meaningfully by coupon and hedge type. Lower coupon Agency RMBS significantly outperformed higher coupon Agency RMBS due to strong index demand from money managers as a result of outsized bond fund inflows. Specifically, spreads of lower coupo…
Agency RMBS performance was also materially impacted by hedge type as U.S. Treasury hedges outperformed swap hedges during the quarter. Ten-year swap spreads to U.S. Treasuries, for example, tightened by almost 10 basis points. As a result, an Agency RMBS position hedged with a 10-year pay-fixed swa…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
funding liabilities. Significantly higher haircuts or initial margin requirements can reduce our ability to leverage our portfolio or may even force us to sell assets, especially if correlated with asset price declines or faster prepayment rates on our assets.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-04
value ratios, and GSE buyouts of delinquent loans underlying our securities. Generally, declining mortgage rates increase the rate of prepayments, while rising rates have the opposite effect.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
On June 1, 2026, Peter Federico, our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Investment Officer, and a Director, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) providing for the sale of up to 203,382 shares of our common stock. The trading a…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice