AIM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AIM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +101 | −180 | ~9 | 16 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | −3 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +9 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
AIM ImmunoTech Inc. and its subsidiaries are an immuno-pharma company headquartered in Ocala, Florida, with a strong foundation of laboratory, pre-clinical and clinical data with respect to the development of nucleic acids and natural interferon to enhance the natural antiviral defense system of the…
The Company’s research and development of Ampligen has included a variety of diseases and health matters:
Ampligen is a wide-spectrum therapeutic that has shown positive safety and efficacy in clinical trials of many different solid tumor types. However, based specifically on clinical success as to safety and efficacy in our pancreatic cancer Early Access Program and an ongoing Phase 2 trial, AIM has ma…
Oncology is one of the areas of biotech known for multibillion-dollar mergers and acquisitions deals – large-market Phase 3 oncology clinical trials with positive data are always a focus for acquisition. AIM strongly believes that such a Phase 3 study will be possible following the ongoing Phase 2 c…
In March 2026, the Company announced an agreement with the PPD clinical research business of Thermo Fisher Scientific to design AIM’s anticipated Phase 3 clinical trial in the use of Ampligen in the treatment of late-stage pancreatic cancer. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is a global leader in scient…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
AIM ImmunoTech Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “AIM”, “Company”, “we” or “us”) are an immuno-pharma company headquartered in Ocala, Florida, and focused on the research and development of therapeutics to treat multiple types of cancers, viral diseases and immune-deficiency disorders for whi…
AIM’s products are Ampligen (rintatolimod) and Alferon N Injection (Interferon alfa). The Company’s flagship product –Ampligen – is a double-stranded RNA (“dsRNA”) molecule being developed for globally important cancers, viral diseases and disorders of the immune system. Ampligen has not been approv…
The Company is currently proceeding primarily in five areas:
We are prioritizing activities in an order related to the stage of development, with those clinical activities such as pancreatic cancer having priority over other experimentation. We intend that priority clinical work be conducted in trials authorized by the FDA or European Medicines Agency (“EMA”)…
We are focused on pancreatic cancer because testing results to date — primarily conducted in the Netherlands — have been very promising. The Netherlands study generated statistically significant data indicating that Ampligen extended survival well beyond the Standard of Care (“SOC”), when compared t…
Legal proceedings
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-17
AIM ImmunoTech, Inc. v. Tudor, et al., in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division, Case No. 5:2022cv00323.
On April 22, 2024, the District Court issued an order granting-in-part Lautz and Jorgl’s Rule 59(e) and Rule 11 motions, respectively. The court entered an order finding Jorgl and Lautz were entitled to recover attorney’s fees and costs and entered judgment on behalf of Jorgl for $216,936, and on be…
In addition, on July 28, 2025, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the September 10, 2024, Order of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas dismissing our complaint against BioLife Plasma Services, L.P. Judgement was entered dismissing the case. The parties have 14 days to seek En Banc Review…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We are currently not in compliance with the Exchange continued listing requirements. If we are unable to regain compliance with the Exchange’s listing requirements, our securities could be delisted, which could affect our common stock market price and liquidity and reduce our ability to raise capita…
We are not currently in compliance with the NYSE American’s stockholders’ equity rule because our stockholders’ equity is less than the required minimum of $6.0 million. Pursuant to the letter from the NYSE American informing us of this non-compliance, we submitted a Plan to the Exchange illustratin…
We cannot assure you that we will be able to regain compliance with the NYSE American listing standards. Our failure to continue to meet these requirements would result in our common stock being delisted from the NYSE American. We and holders of our securities could be materially adversely impacted …
● we may be unable to raise equity capital on acceptable terms or at all;
● the price of our common stock will likely decrease as a result of the loss of market efficiencies associated with the Exchange and the loss of federal preemption of state securities laws;
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice