APGE — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of APGE's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-10
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +66 | −113 | ~14 | 46 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +40 | −37 | ~63 | 187 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −3 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
Zumilokibart is a subcutaneous (“SQ”) extended half-life monoclonal antibody (“mAb”) targeting IL-13.
In August 2023, we initiated a Phase 1 trial of zumilokibart in healthy volunteers. The zumilokibart Phase 1 trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers and consisted of a single-ascending dose (“SAD”) component and a multiple ascending dose component. Eight healthy volu…
In March 2024, we announced positive interim safety and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) data from this trial with zumilokibart demonstrating a potential best-in-class PK profile, including a half-life of 77 days, supporting the potential for every three- to six- month maintenance dosing in AD. Single doses o…
In May 2024, we announced dosing of our first patient in the APEX Phase 2 clinical trial, which is a randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating zumilokibart in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
In July 2025, we announced positive 16-week data from the Part A portion of the APEX Phase 2 clinical trial. Part A of the trial enrolled 123 adult patients who were randomized 2:1 to zumilokibart versus placebo and received an induction regimen dosing of 720mg at Weeks 0 and 2, followed by 360mg at…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
APG777 – anti-IL13 antibody, same mechanism of action as EBGLYSS (lebrikizumab)
APG777 is a subcutaneous (“SQ”) extended half-life monoclonal antibody (“mAb”) targeting IL-13. In August 2023, we announced the dosing of our first participant in our first clinical trial for APG777. In 2024, we announced positive interim safety and pharmacokinetic (“PK”) data from this trial with …
The APEX trial is a randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating APG777 in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Part A of the trial enrolled 123 adult patients who were randomized 2:1 to APG777 versus placebo and received an induction regimen dosing of 720mg at Weeks 0 and 2, followed by 360mg at…
The trial met its primary endpoint, with APG777 showing significantly greater least squares mean percent change from baseline at Week 16 with an EASI reduction of 71.0% compared to placebo of 33.8% (p < 0.001). APG777 showed the highest absolute and placebo-adjusted EASI-75 of any biologic in a 16-w…
EASI-90 of 33.9% compared to placebo of 14.7% (p < 0.05). Treatment of patients with APG777 led to rapid onset of itch relief and achieved a statistically significant reduction by Week 1, with a 50.7% reduction of Itch NRS from baseline compared to placebo of 23.2% (p < 0.01) at Week 16. APG777 was …
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
the continuation of our existing collaborations and licensing and other arrangements and entry into new collaborations and licensing and other arrangements that may be necessary or desirable to develop, manufacture or commercialize our product candidates;
We anticipate developing certain product candidates for use in combination with one or more of our other product candidates, and regulatory issues, safety issues and efficacy results of the monotherapy product candidate may delay or prevent the development, approval and successful commercialization …
We anticipate developing certain product candidates for use in combination with one or more of our other product candidates, which may subject us to additional risks that are not faced for product candidates being administered as monotherapy. Obtaining approval for one or both monotherapies would no…
The benefit risk profile of the combination therapy may be impacted by the efficacy and safety profile of the monotherapy. The adverse side effects of our monotherapy product candidates may be enhanced when combined with other product candidates. If such adverse side effects are experienced, we coul…
Any preliminary or topline data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. From time to time, we may also disclose interim data from our preclinical studies and clinical trials. Interim data are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially chang…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
Our business could be adversely affected by economic downturns, inflation, increases in interest rates, natural disasters, public health crises, political crises, geopolitical events, such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and Israel and Hamas or other macroeconomic conditions, which could…
Disruptions at the FDA and other government agencies could negatively affect the review and approval of our regulatory submissions, which could negatively impact our business.
expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies to perform preclinical studies or clinical trials in addition to those that we are currently conducting or anticipate.
the continuation of our existing licensing arrangements and entry into new collaborations and licensing arrangements;
required IRB approval at each clinical trial site; delays in manufacturing, testing, releasing, validating or importing/exporting sufficient stable quantities of our programs for use in clinical trials or the inability to do any of the foregoing; failure by our CROs, other third parties or us to adh…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-10
On August 13, 2025, Dr. Michael Henderson, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell up to 340,000 shares of our common stock over a period ending July 9, 2026, subject to certain conditions.
On September 22, 2025, Dr. Carl Dambkowski, the Company's Chief Medical Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell up to 132,000 shares of our common stock over a period ending January 7, 2027, subject to certain conditions.
On September 2, 2025, Jane Pritchett Henderson, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, adopted a trading plan intended to satisfy Rule 10b5-1(c) to sell up to 20,000 shares of our common stock over a period ending December 31, 2026, subject to certain conditions.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice