ATIIU — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ATIIU's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +14 | −4 | ~9 | 32 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues to date. Our only activities from inception through June 30, 2026 were organizational activities, those necessary to prepare for the IPO, and, following the IPO, identifying a target company and negotiating for an initial business …
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, we had a net loss of $136,752,922, which consisted of interest earned on demand deposit held in Trust Account of $2,159,137 and interest earned on cash in bank account of $7,555, reduced by the PIPE subscription expense of $100,000,000, change in fair value …
For the six months ended June 30, 2026, we had a net loss of $135,048,119, which consisted of interest income on demand deposit held in Trust Account of $4,301,099 and interest earned on cash in bank account of $19,069, reduced by the PIPE subscription expense of $100,000,000, change in fair value o…
For the six months ended June 30, 2025, we had a net income of $3,517,801, which consisted of interest income on demand deposit held in the Trust Account of $3,794,821 and interest earned on cash in bank account of $30,437, offset by general and administrative expenses of $307,457.
In connection with the Company’s assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with FASB ASC 2014-15, “Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” management has determined that the Company currently lacks the liquidity it needs to sustain opera…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
On May 5, 2026, Registration Statement on Form S-4 was filed with the SEC with respect to the Business Combination.
We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues to date. Our only activities from inception through March 31, 2026 were organizational activities, those necessary to prepare for the IPO, and, following the IPO, identifying a target company and negotiating for an initial business…
For the three months ended March 31, 2026, we had a net income of $1,704,803, which consists of interest earned on cash held in Trust Account of $2,141,962 and interest earned on cash in bank account of $11,514, offset by general and administrative expenses of $488,673.
In connection with the Company’s assessment of going concern considerations in accordance with FASB ASC 2014-15, “Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” we do not believe we will need to raise additional funds in order to meet the expenditures require…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice