ATMH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ATMH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2014-06-24 vs the prior 10-Q · 2013-12-23
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +12 | −12 | ~20 | 37 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2014-06-24
As our company found it difficult to raise capital for our exploration activities for our Tiblemont Claims. We failed to meet our minimum work commitments with the Ministère des Ressources naturelles of the Province of Quebec for all of our Tiblemont Claims and as a result 397 claims expired. Howeve…
On March 18, 2014, our chief executive officer (on behalf of our company) paid, registered and acquired 28 new claims comprising of 1,546.87 hectares, for $1,533.
On January 15, 2014, we entered into a convertible promissory note agreement for $40,000. The note bears interest at 8% per annum, and the principal amount and any interest thereon are due on January 31, 2015. The note is convertible 180 days after issuance into shares of common stock at a variable …
On May 29, 2014, we entered into a convertible note payable agreement for $40,000. The note has a maturity date of May 30, 2015, and carries an annual interest rate of 8%. The note can be converted at any time into common shares at a conversion price that is 75% of the average closing bid prices for…
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended April 30, 2014 and 2013
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2013-12-23
On January 31, 2012, we determined the acquisition costs for these mineral properties were impaired and recorded a related impairment loss in the statement of operations of $231,600.
On April 30, 2012, we determined the acquisition costs for these mineral properties were impaired and recorded a related impairment loss in the statement of operations of $544,500.
As the company has found it difficult to raise capital for its exploration activities for its claims it has failed to meet its minimum work commitments with the Ministère des Ressources Naturelles (MRN) of the Province of Quebec and as a result 393 claims expired. The Company still holds 4 claims co…
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended October 31, 2013 and 2012
The following summary of our results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended October 31, 2013 which are included herein.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice